55 1 ( ) 2016 1 Vol.55 No.1 JournalofCentralChinaNormalUniversity(HumanitiesandSocialSciences) Jan. 2016 ( 100029) : ; ; 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; - 5 1 2015-08-10 (2013YJA630061); (14BZZ066); (cxtd4-09) 39
80 ; 6 20 ( ) 1999 20 50 : 60 3R 3R 7 (Notinmybackyard) ( ) 21 ( ) 20 80 80 2010 2020 40
20 50 60 10 80 21 (Environmentalgovernance) (Goodenvironmentalgovernance) 1 8 Lemos Agrawal 9 ( ) 瑏瑡 ( 1) 1. : ; Backstrand ; 41
; ; 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 : ; 2. : : 瑏瑤 10 瑏瑥 42
3R 1980 瑏瑦 ; 2000 3. (Reduce) (Reuse) (Recycle) 3R 2000 瑏瑧 ( 1) 1900 1954 1970 1 Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ 1900 1954 1970 1980 2000 : (htp://www.env.go.jp/) 43
3R 瑐瑠 ( 0.7 ) 250 300 瑐瑡 瑏瑨 : 瑏瑩 11 4. ( ) 2014 241 241 211 87.5% 61.7% 38.3%; 10-23 94.3%23-35 5.2% 36-50 0%50 0.5% 44
95.7% 1.9% 1.9% 0.5% SPSS19 2 2 1. ( ) 2. ( ) 3. ( ) 4. 5. ( ) 6. 7. 8. ( ) 9. ( ) 10. ( ) 11. ( ) 41% ( 3) 4 : 211 (publicgood) ( ) 33.1% ( 2) 90% 6% 1% 3% 45
3 2 1+ 0.8+ 0.6+ 0.4+ 0.2 169.6 153.4 128.2 117.2 83.2( 3) : 150-170 ; 110-130 ; 3 83.2 100 ; ; 16.2% ; ( ) StoddartTindal Greenfield 瑐瑣 瑐瑢 21.1% 18.8% 17.9% 3 105 34 46 23 3 169.6 1 58 61 54 33 5 153.4 2 18 44 47 77 25 128.2 3 23 47 72 53 16 117.2 4 7 25 32 38 109 83.2 5 46
16.4% 12.9% 12% 0.9% 1. 4 41% 2. ( 3)37% 9% 48.0%; 32.8%; 7.6% 28.4% 18.9% 18.8% 15.7% 6% 5.5% 3.5% 3. 2.9% ( 4): 11.6%; (20%) (15.7%) ; (15.1%) (11.7%) (35.3%) (33.8%) ( 4) ; (10.7%) : 47
5.5% 22.5% 4 65 51 73 49 30 18 38 1 (%) 20 15.7 22.5 15.1 9.2 5.5 11.7 0.3 瑐瑥 ( 5) : ; ( ) 瑐瑤 5 : ( 3):37.3% 48
; ; ; 瑐瑦 ( ) 2. 1. 2003 ( 0.7 ) : 49
2015 200 2000 2007 9 28 ( ) Kikuchi Gerardo 瑐瑨 Chung Poon 2000 ; 3. 瑐瑩 : ; 瑐瑧 3R 50
Wen 瑑瑡 20 NGO 4. Hasegawa 瑑瑠 2015 10 29 51
10BackstrandK. DemocratizingGlobalEnvironmen- talgovernance Stakeholder Democracy afterthe World SummitonSustainableDevelopment. European Journal of InternationalRelations12(2006):467-498. 瑏瑡 : ( ) 2010 1 瑏瑢 : 2009 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 瑏瑦 瑏瑩 : : : 2014 93 89-919092 瑏瑥 : ( ) 2008 6 瑏瑧 : 2001 1 瑏瑨 : 2013 4 ; 瑐瑠 : ; 2007 瑐瑡 : 21 2007 7 瑐瑢 : 2014 6 瑐瑣 StoddartM.C.J.D.B.Tindaland K.L. Greenfield. Governments HavethePower Interpreta- tionsofclimate Change Responsibilityand Solutions A- mongcanadianenvironmentalists. Organization & Envi- 1 : ronment25(2012):39-58. 2012 4 2: 2013 9 2013 1 3 : 2013 1 瑐瑤 : 瑐瑥 : 2011 17 ; : 瑐瑦 : htp://www.env. 2009 4 go.jp/cn/policy/index.html. 4: 瑐瑧 : 2007 6 ; : 2007 6 ( 瑐瑨 KikuchiRyunosukeand Romeu Gerardo. More ) 2010 1 thanadecadeofconflictbetween Hazardous Waste Man- 5 : agementandpublicresistance:a CaseStudyofNIMBY 2009 12 SyndromeinSouselas(Portugal). Journalof Hazardous 67 : Materials172(2009):1681-85. 2013 1 瑐瑩 ChungS.S.and C S Poon. A Comparisonof 8 : : Waste-ReductionPracticesand New EnvironmentalPara- 2007 11 digm ofruraland Urban ChineseCitizens. Journalof 9LemosMariaCarmenand Arun Agrawal. Envi- Environmental Management62(2001):3-19. ronmentgovernance. AnnualReview of EnvironmentRe- 瑑瑠 HasegawaKoichi. ColaborativeEnvironmental- sources31(2006):297-325. isminjapan. Civic Engagementin Contemporary Japan: 52
Established and Emerging Repertoires99-85.New York DordrechtHeidelbergLondon:Springer2001. 瑑瑡 WenXuefengetal. Comparison Research on WasteClassificationbetweenChinaandtheEUJapan andthe USA. Journalof Material Cyclesand Waste Management16(2014):321-334. Japan swasteclassification Management ExperienceandItsInspirationtoChina Lv Weixia DuJuan (SchoolofPublicAdministrationUniversityofInternationalBusinessandEconomicsBeijing100029) Abstract:Japan s waste classificationisrecognized asthe world s mostsuccessful model.basedonitsresourcecharacteristicsacolaborativegovernancesystemhasbeen developedafterpracticefor manyyearswhichiscenteredoncivicparticipationand engagesmanypartiesofthesociety.thissystemisbasedondiversifiedpublicityand educationguaranteed by acomprehensivelegalsystempressured bystrictpenalty system andsupervision mechanismsand motivatedbyefectivesupportandincentive policies.to learn the successfulexperiencethe paper conducted field study and questionnairesurveyinjapaninvestigatingjapanesecitizens evaluationofthewaste classification management. As data displayedcitizen participationpublicity and education legal restraint incentive mechanism and multi-agents colaborative governancearemajorsuccessfulexperienceinjapan swasteclassificationmanagement. FinalywiththediscussionoftheprerequisiteandstatusquoofJapaneseexperienceit proposedsuggestionstoimprovechina swasteclassificationmanagement. Key words: environmental governance; waste classification in Japan; citizen participation;multi-agentscolaborativeg overnance 檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪檪 2015 : 6 2015 12 ( 2015 ) 2014 6 10 ( ) ( ) () 53