80 2012 6 1674-5205 2012 06-0080- 011 100871 Abstract Pursuant to relevant laws social organizations can be societies private non - enterprise entities or foundations and they can be terminated by canceling or revoking the registration or closedown. From time to time the administration agency screens social organizations to clamp down the social organizations that do not conform to the then current policies. This ought not to be the general means of social governance. The termination regimes of social organizations in America Britain Germany and Japan have their own characteristics from which China should learn. While designing the regime for termination of social organizations we could also refer to the relevant rules or doctrines in the Corporation Law and Bankruptcy Law on corporations dissolution and liquidation. To construct a sound and healthy termination regime for social organizations we shall first adhere to the principle that public interest is undertaken voluntarily and social organizations should be terminated at their will and only exceptionally by enforcement then decrease the threshold for social organizations and tolerate their formation and termination third establish the regimes for their valuation and early warning and finally stipulate the liabilities and dispositions of non - distributed property while terminating social organizations. Key Words termination of social organizations voluntary service for public interest legislation DF51 A 1 6 3 406 70 2 639 de - statefication 3 423 2012-03 - 10 1968 2 639 4 1
81 5 50 6 28 37 7 236 1. Social Organizations 8 468 15 Civil Society Organizations Non - Government Organizations NGO Non - Profit Organizations NPO Third Sector Civil Society 9 213-248 2. 4 1 2 1 3 4
82 2012 6 1 3 3. 11 4. 2008 9 3 1988 10 33-38 1. 1990 1991 12 1989 10 1990 2. 1996 2000 1996 12 23 1997 4 5 1999 7 2000 4 3. 2000 2000 1990 1 33 1 25 1 42 1
83 60 13 120 14 50-104 3 15 314 1952 1996 unincorporated associations incorporated associations trust 60 3 1 16 436 17 1025 express trust resulting trust constructive 1992 trust public interest trust 18 political action committee 2 1 1 2 Black s Law Dictionary 8th ed West Publishing Co. S T. 60 Minn U. S. A. 2004 p. 1546. 60 60 1 See Bryan A. Garner editor in chief Paul 2 1 2 3
84 2012 6 2 22 14-15 23 58 2 22 15-16 2 19 308 20 21 28 1. 2006 21 Amtsgericht 22 7-8 54 1 1 2 1 41 3 /4 2001 1 27 NPO 2006 10 3-13 2006 3 27-32 1999 4
85 2. 24 49 2 /3 64 4 62 25 121 3. 1998 NPO NPO NPO 43 NPO 1. 26 462 1 2
86 2012 6 corporate voluntary arrangements 28 437-439 181 4 199 29 315-316 212 6 6 3 1 /10 27 302 183 1. 2. 30 226 1 31 148 22 2. 113 1 2 3 3. 32 349-353 1 1978 701-703 1104 voluntary administration
87 1989 1998 1998 34 33 51 38 113-148 39 70 40 134-135 34 113-114 41 1 35 251 42 36 40 43 148-149 37 1 2005 12 1
88 2012 6 E D 1 NGO APC Accountability Performance Capacity 2 APC 2007 8 44 13 5A AAAAA 4A AAAA 3A AAA 2A AA 1A A 3 2007 10 1 2 3 3 5 4 1-2 1 135 2 3 E Economy Efficiency Effectiveness E D Diagnosis Design Development D 2004 87-89 9 2004 84-104 5 2
89 47 45 48 205 49 180 50 128 12 1999 2 46 64-65 51 179-180 1. M.. 2009. 2. M.. 1988. 3. M / /..... 2006. 4. M. 2006. 5. J. 2009 3 44-47. 6. 2007 10 15 M / /.. 2007. 7. M. 1999. 8. 4 M... 2003. 9 Lester M. Salamon and Helmut K. Anheier. Social Origins of Civil Society Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross - Nationally H. Voluntas International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Volume 9 Number 3 1998 213-248. 10. M / /... 2008. 11 EB /OL. http / /news. sina. com. cn /china /2000-1 - 20 /54783. html 2000-01 - 20 / 2009-08 - 22. 12. M / /. 30. 2008. 13. J. 2004 3 287-294. 14. M. 2007. 15. M / /..
90 2012 6 2006. 16. M / /.. 5 2 / 10. 2005. 17. M. 2004. 18 Alastair Hudson. Equity & Trusts second edition M. London Sydney Cavendish Publishing Limited 2001. 19. J. 2005 11 56. 20. M / /... 2006. 21. M. 2006. 22 Z.. 2006. 23 Z.. 2001. 24. M. 1994. 25. 3 M. 2007. 26. M. 2005. 37. M. 2007. 28. M.. 2005. 29. 2 M. 2007. 30. M. 1995. 31. M. 1986. 32. M. 2009. 33. 2008 M. 2008. 34. M.. 2005. 35. M... 1998. 36 George Kateb. The Value of Association Amy Gutmann Freedom of Association M. Princeton New Jersey Princeton University Press 1998. 37. J. 2005 3 12-18. 38 Robert Pekkanen. Japan s New Politics The Case of the NPO Law J. Journal of Japanese Studies Vol. 26 No. 1 Winter 2000 11-148. 39. M. 2004. 40. M. 2005. 41. M. 2009. 42. J. 2006 1 37-46. 43. 30 M. 2008. 44. M. 2004. 45. EB /OL. http / /www. chinanpo. gov. cn /web /showbulltetin. do type = pre&id = 23487&dictionid = 1835 /2009-09 - 18. 46. M / /... 2008. 47. J. 2008 6 55-61. 48. M. 2005. 49. M / /.. 5 1. 2002. 50. M. 1999. 51. M. 2003. 52. M. 2003.