* 1 E 2008 2 1 2 * E 2004 1 424 2008 6 22 2008 12 19 http / /news. xinhuanet. com /newscenter /2008-12 /19 /content_10528885_1. htm 2008 8 9 5
2010 4 3 judicial activism 4 2009 8 5 6 7 8 1. 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2008 252 2009 8 28 2009 210-241 2003 15 2009 5 2009 6 2010 2-3 N 2005 22 6
瑏瑠 瑏瑡 1 2 3 4 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 2. 瑏瑠 瑏瑡 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 Randy E Barnett Is Rehnquist Court An Activist U. Colo. L. Rev. 2002 p. 1275 2010 2-3 11 G. 1998 340 Black Henry Campbell Black Law Dictionary 8 th ed. West Publish Co. 2004. p. 862. 7
2010 4 Judicial Restraint 瑏瑤 Webster s New World R Law Dictionary 瑏瑥 Oran's Dictionary of the Law 3rd Edition 瑏瑦 瑏瑧 瑏瑨 瑏瑤 瑏瑥 瑏瑦 瑏瑧 瑏瑨 2008 1 2009 2 2010 1 2009 4 2009 9 Judicial restraint n. The doctrine that cases should be decided on the narrowest possible grounds without resolving unnecessary issues especially political or social controversies. Webster s New World R Law Dictionary by Susan Ellis Wild Legal Editor Copyright C 2006 by Wiley Hoboken NJ Published simultaneously in Canada. Judicial restraint A judge s decision and decision - making that excludes the judge s personal views and relies strictly on precedent. Oran's Dictionary of the Law 3rd Edition Daniel Oran J. D. Mark Tosti J. D. Contributing Author Africa Copyright C 2000 8 2008 6 38 8
瑏瑩 3. 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 6 1 瑏瑠 2010 5 5 瑏瑠 9
2010 4 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 瑐瑩 瑑瑠 瑑瑡 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 瑐瑩 瑑瑠 瑑瑡 2010 2-3 R 2004 130 1999 39 K 2006 31 2005 41-52 6 340 瑐瑦 9 瑐瑥 105 2009 164-166 10
瑑瑢 瑑瑣 瑑瑤 瑑瑥 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 瑑瑨 瑑瑩 瑑瑢 瑑瑣 瑑瑤 瑑瑥 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 瑑瑨 瑑瑩 2006 2007 A 2001 5 1810 1997 180 413 J 2009 391 瑑瑣 461 2006 1 瑐瑦 170 瑐瑦 14 6 261-262 11
2010 4 瑒瑠 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 瑒瑣 瑒瑤 瑒瑥 瑒瑦 瑒瑧 瑒瑨 瑒瑠 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 瑒瑣 瑒瑤 瑒瑥 瑒瑦 瑒瑧 瑒瑨 9 14 9 93 9 54 9 49 1 430 457-500 Pekelis The Case for A Jurisprudence of Welfare Law and Social Action Selected Essays of Alexander H. Pekelis 1 8 ~ 15 M. R. Konvitz ed. 1950. 2005 13 N 2002 65 瑒瑦 66 Pound Jurisprudence the History and Prospects of the Social Sciences by Harry Elmer Barnes and others p. 472 瑒瑦 124-125 12
瑒瑩 瑓瑠 瑓瑡 瑓瑢 瑓瑣 1. 瑒瑩 瑓瑠 瑓瑡 瑓瑢 瑓瑣 J 1999 3-4 瑐瑣 4-9 19-22 103-105 137-140 瑐瑧 42 瑐瑧 53 M 2005 237 13
2010 4 瑓瑤 瑓瑥 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 瑓瑦 8 9 瑓瑧 瑓瑨 瑓瑤 瑓瑥 瑓瑦 瑓瑧 瑓瑨 瑐瑣 419 1 418-424 2004 2002 瑐瑧 2 17-18 Tunc It Is Wise not to Take the Civil Code too Seriously pp. 71-85 Essays in Memory of Professor F H. Lawson Wallington and Merkin ed. 1986. Csaba Csaba Varga Utpias of Rationality in the Development of the Idea of Codification Law and the Future of Society Hutley et al. Ed. A. R. S. P. 1977 pp. 27-41. P S 2008 2 14
瑓瑩 瑔瑠 2. 19 20 30 Court - packing Plan 瑔瑡瑔瑢 瑔瑣 瑓瑩 瑔瑠 瑔瑡 瑔瑢 瑔瑣 瑑瑣 24 A. 2002 42 47 J. 2003 W E. Burger William Hubbs Rehenquist O'Connor Anthony Kennedy 2005 2006 15
2010 4 瑔瑤 - 瑔瑥 瑔瑦 瑔瑧 3. 20 19 瑔瑨 瑔瑩 瑖瑠 瑔瑤 瑔瑥 瑔瑦 瑔瑧 瑔瑨 瑔瑩 瑖瑠 7 26 2007 24 瑓瑣 241 M 1998 124 2008 1984 瑐瑥 16
瑖瑡 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 瑖瑤 瑖瑥 瑖瑡 瑖瑢 瑖瑣 瑖瑤 瑖瑥 2009 6 39 4 1 1994 180-225 1998 96-120 17
2010 4 瑖瑦 90 瑖瑧 瑖瑨 瑖瑦 瑖瑧 瑖瑨 2010 1 瑐瑣 2 18
21 瑖瑩 10 瑘瑠 瑖瑩 瑘瑠 瑐瑣 219-269 19
2010 4 70 瑘瑡 瑘瑡 瑔瑧 124-125 20
瑘瑢 瑘瑢 瑐瑣 257-258 21
2010 4 瑘瑣 瑘瑤 1. 瑘瑥 瑘瑣 瑘瑤 瑘瑥 瑒瑥 15-16 2010 2-3 2010 2-3 22
2. 3. = = = = 瑘瑦 瑘瑧 瑘瑦 瑘瑧 2010 1 瑘瑦 23
2010 4 瑘瑨 瑘瑩 4. 瑘瑨 瑘瑩 24
瑝瑠 1. 2. 瑝瑠 瑏瑤 25
2010 4 瑝瑡 3. 瑝瑢 Abstract As a judicial notion and practice the Chinese style judicial activism has a theoretical link with the Western style judicial activism and has as well presented some similar features as a phenomenon. Nevertheless owing to the different political and judicial systems in different states the Chinese style judicial activism and Western style judicial activism is somehow different. In general the Chinese style judicial activism should be viewed as an unique form in the context of the worldwide rule by law milieu. The Western style judicial activism is coupled with judicial independence a more eager pursuit for the explicit rules of social behaviors and a more mature professional judiciary. Therefore different Chinese circumstances call for a restrained judicial activism with a different model in practice. Meanwhile renovation and development is required and the corresponding safeguarding mechanism needs to be established firstly a harmoniously interactive relation between judiciary and politics should be sought secondly a mechanism should be set up for the effective supervision conducted by the highest judicial body over the lower courts thirdly an effective and orderly internal judicial adjudicating mechanism should be established. 瑝瑡 瑝瑢 2009 6 26