43 14 2013 7 Building Structure Vol. 43 No. 14 Jul. 2013 * 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 100013 2 430022 3 200002 1 40 ETABS ABAQUS TU355 TU317 +. 1 A 1002-848X 2013 14-0044-04 Compairion study between the shaking table test and numerical simulation results of Wuhan Center Kong Xiangxiong 1 Shi Tiehua 1 Cheng Shaoge 1 Wang Jun 2 Zhou Jian 3 Chen Kai 3 Shi Hongjun 3 Tang Jie 2 Cai Tao 2 1 Institute of Earthquake Engineering China Academy of Building Research Beijing 100013 China 2 Wuhan CBD Investment & Development Co. Ltd. Wuhan 430022 China 3 East China Architectural Design & Research Institute Co. Ltd. Shanghai 200002 China Abstract In order to study the seismic behavior of Wuhan Center a 1 /40 scale structural model was made and tested on a shaking table. Based on the test results numerical simulation study of modal analysis and dynamic response analysis were done by using two finite element models which were built by ETABS and ABAQUS. The simulation results and shaking table results including natural vibration period vibrational modes acceleration responses and displacement responses were compared. The strain of critical members of finite element models and test model were also discussed. Study results indicate that the parameters of finite element model are rational and the numerical simulation results are basically identical with the test results. So the simulation results can prove the reliability of test results. Keywords shaking table test seismic behavior high-rise building numerical simulation finite element method 1 1 1. 1 2 1 40 359 270m 2 272 652m 2 6 89 438m - - 11. 1m 0. 2m 1 1 390kN 26kN 2 2 3 5 1 3 3 2 * 2011BAJ09B01-01 Email kongxiangxiong@ 126. com
43 14. 45 3 7 220 1 2 cm /s 2 1. 5 3 1 4 c d 1 /40 1 /4 1 /9 600 0. 129 6 7 1 /6 400 1 /256 000 1. 5 2 2 2. 1 /m /Hz /kn / kn m 6 6 0. 1 ~ 50 600 1 800 ETABS ABAQUS / kn m /g /g /g 600 ± 1. 5 ± 1. 0 ± 0. 8 HHJ-5 34 7 2 6 6 6 30 cm /s 2 70 cm /s 2 140 cm /s 2 1. 5 6 7 6 2 6 1 7 1. 3 6 6 6 7 7 4 a b 1. 2 1 6 12 18 20 25 31 33 40 47 49 56 62 64 66 73 79 85 87 88 2 42 YHJ DHJ 8 84 4 54 64 ~ 66 78 66 4
46 2013 ETABS ABAQUS ETABS 5 a 25 000 5 b 36. 2t 6 ABAQUS 3 5 ETABS 3 / cm /s 2 6 ETABS 45 X Y = 1 0. 85 6 ETABS 105 X Y = 1 0. 85 6 ABAQUS 210 X Y Z = 1 0. 85 0. 65 ABAQUS 6 a 3 3. 1 130 000 ETABS ABAQUS 4 7 8 4 ABAQUS ETABS ABAQUS 15% 6 b 37. 9t 4 6 c ETABS ABAQUS 6 d 2. 2 /s /s /% /s /% X 0. 917 0. 872-4. 91 0. 921 0. 44 X 0. 284 0. 276-2. 82 0. 248-12. 68 X 0. 139 0. 145 4. 32 0. 120-13. 67 Y 0. 943 0. 908-3. 71 0. 912-3. 29 Y 0. 275 0. 303 10. 18 0. 236-14. 18 Y 0. 142 0. 162 14. 08 0. 110-22. 54 3. 2 ETABS ABAQUS X 9
43 14. 47 7 ETABS 6 6 ETABS 6 ABAQUS 3. 3 ETABS ABAQUS X 10 11 10 6 6 ETABS 6 ABAQUS 11 12 ABAQUS X 12 2. 8s 10 X 8 ABAQUS 11 X 9 X 66
66 2013 BRB 3 BRB 5 1 GB 50011 2010 S. 6 2010. 1 2. M. 2005. 3. - D. 2007. 4. - J. 2007 29 3 35-40. 2 5. J. 2011 41 11 41-46. 6. J. 2012 31 11 16-21. 7. J. 2011 41 S1 120-124. 47 M. 1. 2012. 12 6 X 3 GB 50011 2010 S. 4 2010. 4 Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. ABAQUS 6. 9 ETABS ABAQUS 1. J. 2010 40 10 11-14. 2. Documentation EB /OL. Providence RI USA 2009.