* DOI:10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2017.02.012 internet of things 1 + 2 1 2 * http / / baike. baidu. com 2016 11 2 10 28 13 32 28 2016 14 238
286 28 286 Actus reus 3 286 6 Convention on Cybercrime 2001 entity 4 1998 The Digital Millennium Copyright Act online service provider Transitory communications System caching Storage of information on systems or networks at direction of users Information location tools 5 3 4 5 See Article 1 c of Convention on Cybercrime. http / /wenku. baidu. com 2016 7 22 239
2017 2 6 10 20 2001 3 15 7 8 Internet Access Provider Internet Presence Provider Internet Content Provider 9 6 7 8 9 See THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1998. http / /www. copyright. gov /legislation /dmca 2016 8 9 2010 2012 2013 2015 76 1 240
QQ 286 1. 286 瑏瑠 瑏瑡 瑏瑠 瑏瑡 1 2 3 4 2009 253 1 2 3 4 I 2006 362-375 286 241
2017 2 21 瑏瑢 prohibitive norm 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 12 2 15 2 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 76 3 See Black s Law Dictionary by Henry Campbell M. A. 6 th Edition St Paul Minn. West Publishing Co. 1990 p. 1212. 242
rule of order 3 10 4 5 6 7 24 2. 瑏瑥 瑏瑥 243
2017 2 1 瑏瑦 2 瑏瑧 3 6 4 3 5 6 6 4 7 1 2 瑏瑦 瑏瑧 2014 2 27 2011 5 4 2014 8 28 8 244
3 4 3. 286 96 4 5 245
2017 2 QQ 10 6 瑏瑨 24 瑏瑨 246
286 3 Mens rea 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 286 1 2 3 4 瑏瑩 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 blackmail 2015 129 2014 174 瑐瑠 178 247
2017 2 瑐瑢 Ignorantia juris neminem excusat 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 瑐瑢 瑐瑣 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 瑐瑠 179 瑐瑠 197-198 3 2009 214 瑐瑠 198-199 248
瑐瑦 Ignorance of the law excuses no one 瑐瑧 individual fairness 瑐瑨 mens rea an element 瑐瑩 knowledge intention Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. Hart 1948 161 2 1976 13 5 瑑瑠 1825 Gent v. Jefferys 瑑瑡 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 瑐瑩 瑑瑠 瑑瑡 Volksbefragungs-Fall AG 1951 5 11 1951 6 21 I. 2012 95-96 See Andrew Ashworth Jeremy Horder Principles of Criminal Law 7th Edition Oxford University Press 2013 p. 218. 瑐瑧 219 See William Wilson Criminal Law Doctrine and Theory 3th edition Pearson Education Limited 2008 pp. 220. 1979 3 31 See Janet Dine & James Gobert Cases & Materials on Criminal Law 3rd Edition Blackstone Press Limited 2000 p. 648. See Dennis J. Baker Textbook of Criminal Law 3rd Edition Sweet & Maxwell 2012 p. 641. 249
2017 2 瑑瑢 286 瑑瑣 35 103 2 105 2 瑑瑢 瑑瑣 2006 123 389 瑐瑦 101 250
瑑瑤 109 266 270 瑑瑥 286 3 瑑瑤 瑑瑥 1934 2 1979 90 2012 85-86 251
2017 2 瑑瑦 3 3 219 1 3 7 3 3 瑑瑧 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 204 2 201 120 2 2006 2 252
瑑瑨 瑑瑩 Rubicon test 瑒瑠 286 瑒瑡 瑑瑨 瑑瑩 瑒瑠 瑒瑡 瑑瑧 6-13 2015 378-382 瑏瑩 249 瑏瑩 252 http / /www. lawtime. cn 2016 8 12 253
2017 2 瑒瑢 Atkin neighbour principle 瑒瑣 286 瑒瑤 286 15 瑒瑢 瑒瑣 瑒瑤 2 2013 155-192 See William Wilson Central Issues in Criminal Law Hart Publishing 2002 p. 141. 2016 1 11 http / /finance. sina. com. cn 2016 8 12 254
24 2 瑒瑥 Abstract Information network includes public telephone network broadcast and television network and computer network. The subject of the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security administration consists of network access provider network platform provider network content and product provider. The act of this crime must meet the conditions that refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security administration refusing to take steps to correct their mistakes according to requirements of supervision authorities and acts belong to one of the four conducts stipulated in the Criminal Law. The author points out that subjective aspect of the crime must have direct intention and the recognition of violating the law and when the actor has wrong recognition of violating the law his act should not be convicted as this crime. In addition the author believes that the main distinction between the crime of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security administration and crimes relevant to jeopardizing state security is whether there exists the purpose of jeopardizing state security the crime must be a completed offense and information network service providers corresponding liabilities of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security administration should not be denied with the reason of neutral help act. 瑒瑥 255