33 7 2017 7 Vol.33No.7 Jul.2017 DOI:10.13652/j.issn.1003-5788.2017.07.043 ResearchprogressofChinesemultiple-flavorliquor CAO Jing YU You-gui CAO Zhi-hua ZENG Hao ( 422000) (Colegeof Food Scienceand ChemicalEngineeringShaoyang UniversityShaoyangHunan422000China) : 12 1 8 1.1 : ; ; ; ; ; [4] Abstract:TheOriginofChineseliquorflavorandthedevelopmentof 8 3 multiple-flavorliquorsaswelastherelationshipamongthetwelve kindsofthem weresummarized.theproductionprocesstechnical 1.1.1 1979 characteristicsformationandflavoringcompositionspropertiesof theeightmultiple-flavorliquorswerereviewedinthisstudy.moreo- verthedevelopmentofmultiple-flavorliquorwasalsoproposed. Keywords:multiple-flavor;relationship offlavortypes;technical process;processcharacteristics;tracecomponents 20 50 60 (1957 1964~1966 ) (1964~1966 ) (1964~1965 ) (1964~1965 ) ; [1]7-9 ; 3 ( [5] ) 1976 [1]10-11 [6] β- 4 2 2 1979 [7] [2]104 1.1.2 1979 [3] 5 : : [4-5] :2016 ( :2016JJ4080); 4 2015 ( :2015NK2103); 2 ( :XJK014AGD015); ( 1.1.3 20 80 :2016FJ02); ( :2016y01) : : (1964 ) E-mail:yufly225@163.com :2017 04 03 200 8 1983 ( ) [9] 1986
2017 7 ( ) [10] [2]103-107 1988 ( ) 1992 2 2 ( ) [11] [15] 1995 ( ) [12] 1996 ( ) [13] 2005 ( ) ( ) [14] 2 12 2.1 8 1.2 12 1 [2]104 8 2 ( ) 4 [13] ( ) [16] 2 2 : [17] 1 Figure1 TherelationshipamongtheMultiple-flavor liquor 2 2 2.2 ; [15] 3 : 2 Figure2 Productiontechniquesofheavyperfumeliquor 3 Figure3 ProductiontechniquesofDongjiu 201
33 7 : 7d; 4) ( 5) ( 2) 8 10 [18] [19] [25] [26] 3 0.55 1 [29] 8 50% 1 [30] 4 [27] [28] [31] 2% [17] 8 ( ; 1 Table1 CharacteristicsofproductiontechniquesofMultiple-Flavorliquor 11~14d ( ( 3 1 1 5 1 ) [20] ) ( 30d ) [21] 29d [22] 39 10 8 6 7 3 30d [23] (3~5 ) 95 ; 7 d; 40 180 ~ 300d ( ) [5] 31%Vol 20~25d 15~30d [24] 12~14d 28~30d 50% 3~6 67%Vol [21] 45~60d [17] 202
2017 7 4 5 Figure4 Comparisonoftotalamountoftracecomponents in Multiple-flavorliquor 2 Figure5 Comparisonoffourestersin Multiple-Flavorliquor [32-39] Table2 Comparisonofaldehydeacidandalcoholin Multiple-Flavorliquor mg/100ml 27.5 58.6 19.6 20.3 4.3 3.39 23.0 30.8 37.4 57.6 80.0 16.3 23.2 41.1 37.3 10.0 15.0 0.4 50.0 7.2 2.9 3.2 2.5 1.6 1.1 9.5 1.36 0.8 132.0 59.3 36.1 46.6 73.0 30.96 37.7 91.9 20.6 5.6 3.6 2.1 16.1 0.7 4.0 46.2 11.4 7.2 6.9 22.9 0.9 14.7 9.7 1.3 1.9 4.0 1.5 3.9 31.1 13.4 7.2 7.8 7.2 0.85 1.8 56.2 48.7 44.2 1.8 5.2 158.5 7.08 7.4 38.0 12.2 77.4 18.3 170.7 189.6 17.67 37.8 30.0 41.0 11.5 2.2 8.8 14.1 2.9 7.4 49.2 22.5 22.5 19.4 20.8 23.30 18.4 17.9 13.3 11.7 9.5 15.5 3.9 1.72 0.7 13.7 104.8 65.2 61.1 63.2 45.2 77.60 47.2 38.0 [340-42] 5 3 Table3 TheStyleCharacteristicsofMultiple-Flavor liquor ( 3) 6 20 [43] 2 4 [44] ( ) 203
33 7 : [5]. [J]. 2017(6): 2 2 17-2528. [6]. [J]. 1997(6):3-6. [7]. [J]. 8 8 2006(11):116-123. [8]. [J]. 2016(5): 21 115-116120. [9]. [J]. 2001(5):47-49. [10]. [J]. 1999(5):75-79. [11]. [J]. 2006(2):99-101104. [12]. [J]. 2007(8):83-85. [45] [13]. [J]. 2009(1):91-93. [14]. [J]. 2009 (4):71-73. [15]. [J]. 2002(2):54-55. [16]. [J]. 2011(10): 117-121. 3 : [17]. [J]. (1) 2005(10):98-104. [18]. : [J]. 1992(5):55-6154. [19]. [J]. 1981(4):11-14. [20]. [J]. 2016(4):67-6973. [21]. [J]. (2) 2017(2):23-32. [22]. [J]. 2010(4):63-64. [23]. [J]. 2014(2): 72-74. [24]. [J]. 2012(8):82-83. (3) [25]. : [J]. 2012(23):89. [26]. [N]. 2010-12-17 (013). 46-49. [28]. : [J]. 1991(4):74-76. [29]. [J]. [1]. [M]. : [J]. 1995(2):120-124. 2011. [31]. [J]. 1998(2): [2]. [M]. : 2016. 14-17. [3]. [J]. 2000(2):29-31. [4]. [J]. 1995 (1):58-62. 204 [27]. [J]. 2013(4): 1988(5):3-652-53. [30]. [32]. [J]. 2012(8):810-819. ( 209 )
33 7 : nostimulatoryactivityofthepolysaccharidesfrom Hyriopsis cumingi[j].internationaljournalofbiological Macromole- cules201047(5):676-680. [25]QIAO De-liangHEXiao-meiWEIChuan-baoetal.Efects ofhyriopsiscumingi polysaccharideson miceimmunologic receptortranscriptionfactorandcytokine[j].journaloffood Science201681(5):H1288-H1294. [26]. [D]. [42]DAIZhi-yuanZHANG Yan-pingZHANG Hongetal.Prep- : 2009:51. arationandcharacterizationofmussel(mytilusedulis)protein [27]. [D]. : hydrolysateswithangiotensin-i-convertingenzyme (ACE)in- 2007:54. hibitoryactivitybyenzymatichydrolysis[j].journaloffood [28]. Biochemistry201236(1):66-74. [J]. 200833(12):40-44. [43]. bohydratepolymers200978(2):199-204. [30]. [45]. [J]. 201542(6):99-101. [31]. [46]. [J]. 200827(2):18-21. [32]. [47]. [D]. : [J]. : 201539(6): 2014:21-27. 602-605. [33]. [D]. : 2016:70. [J]. 201223(9):2191-2192. [34]. HBV [J]. 200928(4):31-34. [J]. 201742(3):186-189. [50]. [D]. : [35]LIU Cheng-chu ZHOU Hai-yan SU Yi-cheng et al. 2009:64-65. [29]QIAO De-liangKE Chun-lingHU Bingetal.Antioxidant activitiesofpolysaccharidesfrom Hyriopsiscumingi[J].Car- Chemicalcompositionsandfunctionalpropertiesofproteiniso- latedfromby-productoftriangleshelpearlmusselhyriopsis cumingi[j].journalof AquaticFood Product Technology 200918(3):193-208. [36]. humanhealth[j].rsc Advances20166(31):26 163- [J]. 200829(9):334-337. 26177. [37]. [D]. : [53]XU Qiao-qing WANG Gai-ling YUAN Han-wenet al. 2014. cdnasequenceandexpressionanalysisofanantimicrobialpep- [38]ZHOU Ya-junHE QinZHOU Dan.Optimizationextraction ofproteinfrom musselbyhigh-intensitypulsedelectricfields [J].JournalofFoodProcessing & Preservation201641(3): e12962. [39]. [J]. 201534(5):517-523. [40]. ACE [J]. 2007(10):133-137. [41]. [J]. 20099(4):76-79. [J]. 201233(13):213-216. [44]. [D]. : 2016:85-86. [J]. 201237(7):92-96. [J]. 201339(4):12-16. [48]. / [49].HPLC [51]. [J]. 201733(2):199-204. [52]NATARAJANSBKIM YSHWANGJWetal.Immuno- modulatorypropertiesofshelfishderivativesassociated with tidetheromacininthetriangle-shelpearlmusselhyriopsis cumingi[j].comparativebiochemistry & PhysiologyPartB: Biochemistry & MolecularBiology2010157(1):119-126. ( 204 ) [33]. [D]. : 2015(3):10-14. 2015:25-32. [34]. [J]. 1992(1): [41]. [J]. 76-83. [35]. [J]. 2001(5):47-49. [36]. 2011(9):128-131. [J]. 2010(12):58-64. [37]. [J]. 2010(1):97-99. : 2001(12):93-95. [38]. [J]. 1992(1): [45]. [J]. 2008(7): 83-88. [39]. [J]. [40]. [J]. 2007(7):84-86. 2010(4):108-110. [42]. [J]. [43]. [J]. [44]. [J]. 1984(2):9-12. 65-68. 209