Journal of Building Structures 1000-6869 2011 06-0010-08 32 6 2011 6 Vol. 32 No. 6 June 2011 002 200092 14 1 /15 7 7 7 8 MIDAS 7 TU973 TU317. 1 A Seismic performance of multi-tower structure with large podium and overlapping column LU Xilin ZHANG Cuiqiang LI Jianbao LU Wensheng State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai 200092 China Abstract In order to evaluate the seismic performance of a large podium-multi-tower complex high-rise structure with vertical overlapping column transfer block a 1 /15-scaled model shaking table test to simulate a 14-story two-tower structure with overlapping transfer column was conducted under a series of loading cases to study the failure mode and seismic performance of the whole structure including frequently occurred intensity 7 basic intensity 7 rarely occurred intensity 7 and rarely occurred intensity 8. A numerically comparative study was done using the software MIDAS in this paper. The results show that the overlapping column transfer block as well as the adjacent slab can maintain elastic after the case of rarely occurred intensity 7 and can meet the requirement of collapse prevention under strong earthquakes. The structure with overlapping column has uniform vertical stiffness and does not have any soft story. Measures should be taken to strengthen the roof of the podium due to the abrupt change of shear force. The columns of the podium should be strengthened properly to aviod the column damages from the shaking table test. Keywords overlapping column transfer structure elevation setback multi-tower with large podium shaking table test finite element analysis seismic performance 90815209 51021140006 D09050600370000 1955 E-mail lxlst@ tongji. edu. cn zcq0716@ 126. com 2010 11 10
0 1 /25 1 1 2-3 3-0. 100m 14 4. 2m 2 ~ 3. 9m 3. 2m 1 /35 49. 2m 23. 6m - - - 250mm 3 300mm 32. 1% 38. 1% 250mm C60 ~ C50 ~ C40 C30 4 3 - - - - - - 5-2 - - - - - - - 1 ~ 4 5 MIDAS 6 6 1 /5 SAP2000 7 8 1 /5 9 1 /4 1 10 MIDAS Fig. 1 The 2nd floor plan 11
2 Fig. 2 The 7th floor plan 11 1 /15 3. 28m 22. 4t 16. 8t 5. 6t 2. 1. 1 1 2. 1. 2 3 Fig. 3 The 8th floor plan 5 Fig. 5 1-1 1-1 profile 4 Fig. 4 Roof plan 2 2. 1 6 MIDAS Fig. 6 Model in MIDAS 12
1 0. 85 3 X Y 2 3 1 7 Table 1 Typical similitude factors of model structure El Centro Pasadena SHW2 1 /15 0. 45 6. 369 2. 699 2. 5 0. 002 2 7 Table 2 Compressive strength and elastic modulus 7 of micro-concrete f cu /MPa E c /MPa X Y 14 11. 1 6. 0 15798 11210 14. 3% 15. 9% 12 12. 6 5. 4 13894 8171 10 9. 5 3. 0 13131 5787 8 20. 1 8. 2 23108 12704 7 7 15. 6 6. 6 23977 10812-6 21. 9 9. 6 23644 14036-7a 5 28. 8 13. 4 24610 9784 7b 4 19. 5 8. 3 26574 13623 3 19. 1 5. 8 15504 8674 2 21. 3 6. 7 16463 13964 8 1 38. 6 5. 7 27333 11505 19. 8 7. 2 20366. 9 10933. 6 2. 2 20 15 3 3 3 6 40 A1 ~ A40 3 4 6 3 6 2. 3 Ⅳ 7 1 El Centro 2Pasadena 3 SHW2 1 ~ 3 7 1 2 X Y 3 X Y 8 1 2 7d 7c Fig. 7 7 Model failure pattern 13
7e 8 7f 4 4. 1 a 3 MIDAS 1 Y T 4 /T 1 = 0. 58 T 4 /T 2 = 0. 61 JGJ 3 2002 12 2 3 7 Y b 9. 0% X 7. 7% 8 Y 7 X Y Fig. 8 The 1st vibration mode translation in Y direction 29. 4% 30. 6% 7 7 7 7 Y 70. 0% X 8 73. 0% 51. 9% 8 12 Y 1 3 2 7 83. 3% X 83. 0% 54. 2% Y X 7 Y X 3 4 8 ~ 11 2 3 2 Y 13 Y 3 2 X 4 6 3 3 2 7 4. 2 7 3 2 X Y 12 F7 B7 R7 R8 7 Table 3 3 Vibration frequencies and vibration modes of prototype structure f t /Hz f n /Hz 7 7 7 8 f t /Hz Δ t f t /Hz Δ t f t /Hz Δ t f t /Hz Δ t 1. 017 0. 948 1. 017 0 0. 871-14. 4% 0. 557-45. 2% 0. 436-57. 1% Y 1. 066 0. 985 1. 017-4. 6% 0. 896-16. 0% 0. 606-43. 2% 0. 436-59. 1% Y 1. 211 1. 088 1. 163-3. 9% 1. 017-16. 0% 0. 629-48. 0% 0. 485-59. 9% X 1. 744 1. 805 1. 744 0 1. 453-16. 7% 1. 210-30. 6% 1. 180-32. 3% f t f n MIDAS Δ t 14
a a Fig. 9 b 9 Y The 2nd vibration mode translation in Y direction b 11 Fig. 11 The 4th vibration mode rotation a Fig. 10 b 10 X The 3rd vibration mode translation in X direction 7 12 3 2 7 Fig. 12 Horizontal acceleration amplification coefficient of tower 3 and tower 2 15
4. 3 4 13 Table 4 Maximum displacement and total drift and inter story drifts of prototype structure 1 X Y 7 MIDAS MIDAS Δ /mm Δ /H d max /h Δ /mm Δ /H d max /h 7 X 35. 00 1 /1406 1 /864 31. 82 1 /1546 1 /1339 7 Y 33. 47 1 /1470 1 /1000 28. 49 1 /1727 1 /1481 2 13a 13b X 114. 23 1 /431 1 /262 7 13c 13d 7 Y 158. 12 1 /311 1 /197 7 X 468. 42 1 /105 1 /102 7 Y 282. 17 1 /174 1 /132 7 1 7 X 1 /1406 Y 1 /1470 d 3 13c 13d max /h X 1 /864 Y 1 /1000 1 /800 2 7 X 1 /105 Y 1 /174 d max /h X 1 /102 Y 1 /132 1 /100 5 Fig. 13 13 Distribution of shear force and ratio of shear force to weight MIDAS 1 7 7 8 3 2 2 1 4. 4 2 4 MIDAS Δ Δ /H 3 d max /h 4 16
1. M. Building Structure 2003 33 12 13-16. in 2007. LU Xilin. Seismic theory Chinese and application of complex high-rise structures M. Beijing Science Press 2007. in Chinese 2 J. 1999 3 48-51. WANG Ling LU Xilin. Research on a seismic behaviors weekly connected high-rise structure J. Building Science Research of Sichuan 1999 3 48-51. in Chinese 3 J 2004 24 4 99-105. GONG Zhiguo LU Xilin. 12 8-12. Fu Xueyi Lei Kanger Yang Xiangbing et al. The research and application of structure with FU Xueyi WANG Cuikun et al. Design of complex high-rise structures M. Beijing China Architecture & Building Press 2005. in Chinese 7 J. 2003 33. Tongji University. Shaking table model test of building with 2 & 3 towers of NO. 174 block in Huangpu District 12 13-16. Gu Lei Fu Xueyi. The analysisi of the FEM and method of the pre-stressing of the lapping column transfer structure in Fujian Industrial Bank J. 8. J. 2003 33 transfer bracket in Fujian Industrial Bank J. Building Structure 2003 33 2 8-12. in Chinese 9. J. 2003 33 12. 3-7. Xu Peifu Fu Xueyi Geng Nana et al. The. research of experiment and design points of the structure with transfer bracket J. Building Structure 2003 33 LU Wensheng et al. Shaking table model test of a 12 3-7. in Chinese hybrid high-rise building structure J. Earthquake 10. Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2004 24 4 J. 2006 36 99-105. in Chinese 2 25-28. Quan Xueyou Kong Zhijian Deeng Fan 4. et al. Experimental study on vertical load conversion J. 2008 28 5 bracket of the upper column outsides the low column 71-78. ZHOU Ying LU Xilin LU Wensheng et al. J. Building Structure 2006 36 2 25-28. in Seismic performance of a multi-tower hybrid tall Chinese building J. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering 11. Vibration 2008 28 5 71-78. in Chinese J. 2003 3 30-38. ZHOU 5. J. Ying LU Wensheng LU Xilin. Practical model design 1995 16 6 3-10. FANG Ehua WEI method of shaking table tests J. Structural Engineers Yuning. Earthquake responses of muti-tower structure 2003 3 30-38. in Chinese with a large podium at bottom J. Journal of Building 12 JGJ 3 2002 S. Structures 1995 16 6 3-10. in Chinese JGJ 3 2002 Technical specification for concrete 6. structures of tall building S. in Chinese M. 2005. XU Peifu 13. 174 2# ~ 3# R. 2010. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering of Shanghai City R. Shanghai Tongji University 2010. in Chinese 17