43 7 2013 4 Building Structure Vol. 43 No. 7 Apr. 2013 518038 TU398 +. 2 A 1002-848X 2013 07-0059-06 Discussion on inclined column design of a super high-rise building Zhang Lin Zhang Delong Shenzhen CAPOL International & Associates Limited Shenzhen 518038 China Abstract According to the structure characteristics of Shenzhen China-Life Tower seismic performance objectives of structure internal force and node analysis of inclined columns buckling analysis of pillared and inclined columns force analysis of the floor beams and plate connected with inclined columns were discussed. Combined with the results of dynamic elastic-plastic time-history analysis the weak positions and members are found out and the corresponding strengthening measures are adopted. Keywords inclined column super high-rise building seismic performance objectives of structure dynamic elastic-plastic time-history analysis 1 6 21 78 035m 2-35 149. 30m 4. 5 11. 6 4 17. 400m 5-22. 6m 1 6. 0m 2 4. 4m 3 4. 5m 4. 2m 20. 7m 1 2 50 7 0. 10g Ⅱ T g α max 0. 35s 0. 092 1 2 3 C 0. 75kN / m 2 1. 1 Email lzhang@ hygj. cn
60 2013 4 5 2 4 ~ 1 2 11 3 ~ 6 1 1 500 Y 3 X 90-67 1 500 / 1 200 1 800 1 100 1 100 / mm 400 ~ 700 C40 ~ C60 250 ~ 400 C40 ~ C60 700 800 ~ 400 800 600 900 ~ 1 000 900 C30 ~ C35 600 800 ~ 800 900 C30 ~ C35 400 700 ~ 600 700 C30 ~ C35 100 120 150 180 C30 ~ C35 = 23 7
43 7. 61 6 2 2 1 3 4 4 7 4. 1 3 1 A 2 16. 9% 3 2 30% 4 3 4. 2 11 A 2011 5 α 1 max 0. 5 2 3 C SATWE MIDAS / Gen 1? / A-11 4? / A-8 10? / A-5 SATWE 3 3 MIDAS / Building M Structure u Master / mm / mm / kn / kn m N u / kn / kn m 1 1 200 1 800 13 000 10. 8 28 636 6 028 45 617 21 600 4 1 500 1 500 9 050 6. 0 32 589 2 775 79 114 27 900 10 1 500 1 500 4 500 3. 0 26 223 1 737 83 278 27 900
62 2013 1 2 X Y R x R y R z 1 11 4 / mm 4 X 14. 6 Y 16. 2 1. 2% 1. 8% 123 110 13. 2 14. 3 110 97 11. 4 12. 8 97 81 4 8 5 1. 25 4. 4 4. 3 ANSYS Solid65 GB 50010 2010 4 C ANSYS Link8 Solid65 8 5 5 N / kn N cr / kn μ 1 19 938 40. 33 804 159 1. 252 2 33 362 65. 28 2 177 872 0. 799 von Mises 9 9 120MPa
43 7. 63 9 X 11 10 4. 5 6 / mm / kn / kn m / % / kn m 1? / A-6 800 1 200-1 026-854 6 236 6 966 1. 8 7 830 9 390 1? / A-8 800 1 200 915 782 5 434 5 776 1. 8 8 710 10 030 11? / A-6 600 800-220 - 345 820 1 577 1. 8 2 650 3 690 11? / A-8 600 800 249 395 774 1 484 1. 8 2 780 3 750 1 2 X Y 2 4. 6 6 4 50% 5 6
64 2013 10 X / MPa 4. 7 1 2 2 1. R. 2012. 2 GB 50011 2010 S. 2010. 3 180mm 11 3 JGJ 3 2010 S. 150mm 0. 25% 2011. 4 GB 50010 2010 S. 2011. 5 5. 2000 1 J. 2002 32 8 15-19. 6. J. 2012 42 6 64-68. 87 concentrated force C / / Proceeding of the Fifth International Symposium on Tubular Structure. 1993 345-352. 6 LEE M M K WILMSHURST S R. Strength of multiplanar tubular KK-joints under antisymmetrical axial 1. loading J. Journal of Structural Engineering 1997 J. 2011 41 7 74-83. 123 6 755-764. 2. 7. J. 2011 41 7 84-88. J. 2003 36 8 24-30. 3 DEXTER E M LEE M M K. Static strength of axially 8. KK TT loaded tubular K-joints. I behavior J. Journal of J. 1998 2 16-20. Structural Engineering 1999 125 2 194-201. 9. T2 4 SOHU C K CHAN T K YU S K. Limit analysis of J. ultimate strength of tubular X-joints J. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000 126 7 790-797. 5 ZHAO X L HANCOCK G J. Plastic mechanism analysis of T-joints in RHS subject to combined bending and 2010 40 9 20-22. 10. J. 2010 40 12 10-18.