43 11. 25 1 2 3 31 Torre Mayor Y 4 5 4 42 3 3. 1 A09 A 1 12 110. 4 m 2 1 28. 7 m 2 50 388m 94 5 50-7 0. 15g γ - 0 1. 0 8 3. 2 6 6

43 11 2013 6 Building Structure Vol. 43 No. 11 Jun. 2013 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 100022 2 100037 A09 TU973. 3 + 1 TU973. 3 + 2 A 1002-848X 2013 11-0024-06 Application analysis of energy dissipation and wind vibration control for the high-rise building of Xiangluowan in Tianjin Wan Yixiu 1 Chen Yongqi 2 Wu Lianjie 1 Ma Liangzhe 2 Hu Qinghua 1 Xue Hengli 2 1 Beijing R&F Properties Development Co.Ltd.Beijing 100022China 2 Beijing Qitai Shock Control and Scientific Development Co.Ltd.Beijing 100037China Abstract The wind and seismic resistance engineering applications of viscous dampers in high-rise building projects at home and abroad were listedand the international relevant department's researches were introducedwhich fully showed that viscous damper has significant effect on structure protection. Taking the practical project of block A09 of Xiangluowan in Tianjin as an examplethrough analyzing the changes in structure interlayer displacement anglefloor shear force and wind vibration acceleration the obvious seismic reduction effect and wind vibration control effect of viscous damper were obtained. Finally the additional damping ratio of viscous damper in different cases was estimated by the equivalent contrast methodrespectively. Keywords viscous damper energy dissipation wind vibration control toggle 1 2010 2 27 42 4 8. 8 1 3 LATBSDC 4 1 ~ 3 2 Torre Mayor 5 6 1999 2. 5 57 225m Torre Mayor 2003 1 21 2 2008 6 13 000 600 NCSEA Structure 1 2 700 Viscous dampers come of age 2 30s 1 PEERC Colima 7. 6 Email wanyixiu@ qq. com

43 11. 25 1 2 3 31 Torre Mayor Y 4 5 4 42 3 3. 1 A09 A 1 12 110. 4 m 2 1 28. 7 m 2 50 388m 94 5 50-7 0. 15g γ - 0 1. 0 8 3. 2 6 6

26 2013 f j f j = cosθ j 7 f j = 1. 0 2 f j 2. 0 ~ 4. 0 3. 4 83 X 37 Y 46 6 2. 3 X Y 2 C = 4 000kN s /m 0. 3 α = 0. 3 3 3 X Y 76 3 0 3 65 0 7 7 6 54 6 9 15 2 50 6 8 14 40 8 8 16 29 7 7 14 13 7 7 14 3. 5 3. 5. 1 ETABS 10 433 90% W u F C 0 θ 1 θ 2 l αl 3. 3 F Dj = C j u Dj 1 C j u Dj u Dj u Dj Δ rj u Dj = f j Δ rj 2 /s /% U X U Y R Z 1 7. 67 56. 82 3. 91 0. 02 2 7. 55 4. 06 51. 75 0. 44 3 3. 80 0. 23 0. 72 64. 03 4 2. 55 19. 02 0. 05 0. 03 5 2. 36 0. 08 16. 86 0. 48 6 1. 59 0. 02 0. 07 7. 52 7 1. 47 0. 48 0. 01 0. 65 8 1. 47 0. 02 0. 00 0. 15 9 1. 47 0. 00 0. 04 2. 74 10 1. 44 6. 95 0. 00 0. 01 4

43 11. 27 3. 5. 2 7 T = 10s 6s 9 7 5 2 7 0. 15g 5 7. 67 5 = 38. 35s X Y Z 1 0. 85 0. 65 8 55gal 46. 75gal 35. 75gal 150gal 127. 5gal 97. 5gal 10 310gal 263. 5gal 201. 5gal 3. 5. 3 1 2 5 X 23% ~ 36% Y 30% ~ 38% 8 /% 5 X 23% ~ 38% Y X Y X Y 26% ~ 35% 9 12 ~ 20 12 ~ 29 12 ~ 19 19 ~ 24 8 ~ 13 8 ~ 19 5 ~ 11 11 ~ 19 X 30% ~ 51% Y 29% 3. 6 ~ 49% 10 JGJ 3 2010 9 10 8 a max 0. 15m /s 2 3. 6. 1 10

28 2013 388m 0. 172m /s 2 9 0. 15m /s 2 3. 6. 2 A09 RWDI U X U Y R Z RWDI 11 0. 01 6 9 12 12 11 388m E 93 388m 6 d E s X Y / m /s 2 0. 386 51-0. 370 04 0. 378 7 / m /s 2 0. 099 70-0. 107 97 0. 104 /% 74. 21 70. 82 72. 51 3. 7 1 ξ a = E d 313. 2mm 3 4πE s 13 X E d 4. 6s 296mm E s 3 X 3. 7. 1 X E s E d 3 1 2 800. 5mm 14 X 4. 6s 801mm 3. 7. 2 ETABS /mm 7 X Y 278 252 313. 2 315. 3 800. 5 774 4 2

43 11. 29 8 2 8 /% 8 13 X Y 4 10. 1 14. 68 5 7. 8 11. 8 4 11 12 5 8 10 X 1 7 ~ 8 9 ~ 11 14 3. 8 X 5 3 6 3. 7. 3 2 40% 1. 5 4 1 Torre Mayor 7. 6 2 3 70% 29% ~ 51% 12% ~ 24% 5% ~ 19% 4 67

43 11. 67 ABAQUSMIDAS /Building SAP2000 EPDA GSNAP SAP2000 PERFORM-3D ABAQUS MIDAS /Building EPDA 6. 4 PERFORM-3D EPDA ABAQUS GSNAP MIDAS / Building 4 ABAQUS PERFORM-3D EPDAGSNAP MIDAS /Building 3 EPDA GSNAP PERFORM-3D EPDA ABAQUS ABAQUSSAP2000 MIDAS /BuildingPERFORM-3D 10 GSNAP EPDA 7 1 ABAQUS PERFORM-3D GSNAP 2 1. SAP2000 J. 2001 20 5 26-30. PERFORM-3D 2. EPDA GSNAP MIDAS /Building MIDAS /Building 3 5 MIDAS /BuildingSAP2000 SAP2000 MIDAS /Building ABAQUS J. 2009 25 2 869-873. 29 1 LAUREN D CARPENTERFARZAD NAEIM MARSHALL LEWet al. Rodolfo saragoni and macarena schachter adaros. Performance of tall buildings in concepción during the 27 february 2010 moment magnitude 8. 8 offshore maulechile earthquake J. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 2011 20 1 17-36. 2 NCSEA. Viscous dampers come of age a new method for achieving economy in tall buildings R. Chicago National Council of Structural Engineers Associations 2008. 3 GARY C HARTCHUKWUMA G EKWUEMEGREGG BRANDOWet al. High performance /smart and living buildings the benefits of using viscous dampers on a high-rise building part Ⅰ J. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings201019 4 457-477. 4 LATBSDC. An alternative procedure for seismic analysis and design of tall buildings located in the los angeles region R. California Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council2008. 5. Torre Mayor J. 2011 26 1 50-54. 6 HUANG H C. Efficiency of the motion amplification device with viscous dampers and its application in highrise buildings J. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration2009 8 4 521-536. 7. J. 2012 45 3 58-66. 8 GB 50011 2010 S. 2010. 9 JGJ 3 2010 S. 2011.