* 2016 1 31 2015 1366 2014 1 1 * 1. 6 2015 1 7 3 244
2012 1 2013 2 25934. 795 20 100 2-5 2013 2014 4 3662. 0644 2014 8 Ⅲ 3662. 0644 4. 5 160666745. 11 2014 12 30 40% 40% 245
2016 3 2014 58 55 2015 1 1 2012 55 58 55 2 55 2 2012 132 246
2012 8 55 2012 8 3 4 2013 6 2013 10 5 2015 1 1 58 55 2014 6 2014 12 6 30% 57% 11% 7 3 4 5 6 7 2012 9 14 6 http/ /www. npc. gov. cn /huiyi /lfzt / hjbhfxzaca /2012-08 /31 /content_1735795. htm 2016 4 5 http/ /www. npc. gov. cn /npc /xinwen /lfgz /flca /2013-07 /17 /content _ 1801189. htm 2016 4 5 2015 35 2014 8 247
2016 3 2014 700 2015 9 45 8 58 2014 12 30 2015 1 1 55 55 2015 1 11 瑏瑠 9 8 9 瑏瑠 http/ /toutiao. com /i6260426043266433538 / 2016 5 2 2013 4 2012 10 2004 4 2011 1 248
瑏瑡 2015 4 瑏瑢 2015 7 瑏瑣 2015 12 18 25 瑏瑤 瑏瑡 瑏瑢 瑏瑣 瑏瑤 2008 6 2015 7 13 http/ /news. xinhuanet. com /legal /2015-07 /01 /c_ 1115784894. htm 2016 5 2 http/ /www. h2o-china. com /news /viewid = 227101 2016 5 3 http/ /news. hexun. com /2016-01- 07 /181659295. html 2016 5 2 249
2016 3 2016 2 10 200 23 瑏瑥 瑏瑦 瑏瑥 瑏瑦 http/ /www. chinacourt. org /law /detail /2016 /02 /id /148645. shtml 2016 5 2 No. 142016 2016 136-145 250
瑏瑧 瑏瑨 瑏瑩 瑏瑧 瑏瑨 瑏瑩 2009 2 2011 1 2014 10 29 8 251
2016 3 1. 6 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 瑐瑢 瑐瑠 瑐瑡 瑐瑢 2015 9 9 8 2014SPZD011 2014 11 12 8 252
29 1 253
2016 3 瑐瑣 1 2 3 瑐瑣 2015 3 254
瑐瑤 66 4 3 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 1698 瑐瑧 1945 瑐瑨 瑐瑤 瑐瑥 瑐瑦 瑐瑧 瑐瑨 2011 4 2005 2 2013 5 66 2015 2 2015 5 2009 35 197 2013 351 2005 218 255
2016 3 2013 2013 Ⅲ 100 1000 6 Ⅲ 4. 5 6 Ⅲ 4. 5 256
1. 瑐瑩 瑑瑠 瑐瑩 瑑瑠 2010 1 2008 5 257
2016 3 瑑瑡 2. 瑑瑢 3. 瑑瑡 瑑瑢 2012 10-18 2007 3 258
100-1000 瑑瑣 瑑瑤 1. 瑑瑣 瑑瑤 1999 2 2009 5 8 259
2016 3 瑑瑥 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 瑑瑨 100-1000 6 1. 2. 3. 4. 瑑瑥 瑑瑦 瑑瑧 瑑瑨 2014 11 5 8 2015 9 2001 1 2014 12 260
5. 瑑瑩 1. 6 40% 6 瑒瑠 20 21 瑑瑩 瑒瑠 瑑瑢 2014 4 261
2016 3 瑒瑡 2. 1. 6 瑒瑢 6 Ⅲ 瑒瑡 瑒瑢 http/ /www. court. gov. cn /zixun-xiangqing-13025. html 2016 5 2 2012 5 262
4. 5 6 Ⅲ 4. 5 3. 40% 40% 1. 6 1. 6 瑒瑣 瑒瑣 2014 3 263
2016 3 58 AbstractThe environmental pollution case between Environmental Protection Association of Taizhou City and Taixing Jinhui Chemicals Co. Ltd referred as Jinhui afterwardand Jiangsu Changlong Chemicals Co. Ltd referred as Changlong afterwardis a classic environmental public interest litigation. The three focuses in the trial are as follows. Firstlydoubts have been raised whether the Environmental Protection Association of Taizhou possesses qualifications of the plaintiff to bring a civil action of environmental public interest litigationsecondlyhow to determine the nature of Jinhui and Changlong s behavior in handling the acid as the byproduct in a trading way in the caseas well as the causation between the behavior and the damage causedthirdly the Court focuses on the cognizance of damage and selection of remedies. Generally speaking the cognizance of qualifications of the plaintiff by the court implies its positive consideration of giving full play of the judicial environmental protection by supporting environmental protection organizations in bringing environmental public interest litigations. What s morecognizance of the fact and presumption of causation possess clear juridical logicthe Court has also explored damages and possible remedies in an innovative way. Howeverwhen confirming the positive meaning of this casejudicial rationality on environmental protection should be particularly emphasized. 264