30 4 2011 12 GLOBAL GEOLOGY Vol. 30 No. 4 Dec. 2011 1004 5589 2011 04 0690 07 123000 P541 X24 A doi 10. 3969 /j. issn. 1004-5589. 2011. 04. 027 Research on mine dynamic environment based on geo-dynamic division CHEN Ying ZHANG Hong-wei HAN Jun SONG Wei-hua Mining Institute Liaoning Technical University Fuxin 123000 Liaoning China Abstract The mining and its engineering are conducted in the tectonic blocks and easy to impact by plate tectonic activity. The mine dynamic disaster is the close contact with the activities of plates and tectonic blocks. Based on plate tectonic theory authors determine the tectonic activity characteristics of different scales and levels by geo-dynamic division method and put forward that regional geological dynamic environment can be evaluated by contrast intensity of structural cave and terrain curvature changes. It is revealed the dynamic conditions and energy foundation of mine dynamic disaster and the authors established the link between plate movement and mine engineering practice. Application results show there is the geological dynamic background in Fuxin mining area and the points where the rock burst took place are in the dynamic impact area which is determined by geo-dynamic division. Key words geo-dynamic division dynamic environment rock burst plate tectonics Fuxin mining area 1-9 10-12 2011-03-25 2011-10-14 50874058 200801470005.
4 691 1 6 200 7 20 8 3 2004 12 26 9 500 85% 5 6 2008 5 12 15 106 8. 0 10 km3 082 11 2 525 557 18. 1% 14 1 7 2010 Nazca 15 8 cm 2 8 13 1 Fig. 1 Schematic deformation models of Longmenshan fault before and after Wenchuan earthquake
692 30 3 3. 1 16 2 Fig. 2 Ⅰ class geo-dynamic division in China 3 Fig. 3 Ⅱclass geo-dynamic division in Liaoning Province 3. 2 17 Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ 2 3 Ⅰ Ⅴ
4 693 30 6 20% 5 4 11 6 6-104 ~ - 145 m Fig. 4 4 Three-dimensional topography of Fuxin structural cave 5 Fig. 5 Relationship between terrain curvature change with coal and gas outburst in 10th mine 6 Fig. 6 Comparison between active faults and rock burst point in Wulong mine 4 4. 1
694 30 7 60 km 15 km 400 ~ 600 m a b Fig. 7 7 Structural cave profile in Fuxin mine 4. 2 Ⅰ ~ Ⅴ 8 Ⅴ 9 Fig. 9 Burst location in the impact area of fracture in Wulong mine Fig. 8 8 Ⅴ Ⅴ class blocks in Fuxin mine 9 2002 4 18 3 50 9-1 2003 3 28 16 50 9-2 3311 3311 Ⅴ-3 4. 3 2006 5 17 3312 1 3311-3 2005 11 4 9 3311-9 2006 3 10 3321
4 695 9-10 Ⅴ-3 Ⅴ-3 36 ~ 52 2 3 2 10 2005 2 14 15 9-5 1. J. 3316 2005 6 82-84. 2. 14 HE Yong-jin. Discussion on tsunami-earthquake relation J. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology 2005 Ⅳ-2 Ⅴ-2 6 82-84. Ⅳ-2 2. J. 2005 25 1 10-12. 3316 3315 12 HU Zhi-qi ZHENG Wen-heng LU Ming-yong. Preliminary study on crustal stress and its effect on earthquake Ⅳ-2 Ⅴ-2 Ⅳ-2 J. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics 2005 25 1 10-12. 3. 5. 2004 12 26 10 Ⅳ-2 Ⅴ-2 J. Fig. 10 Relationship between burst location with Ⅳ-2 andⅤ-2 blocks in Haizhou shaft 2005 12 1 281-287. MA Zong-jin YE Hong. The Dec 26 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake tectonic setting and the tsunami disaster J. Earth Science Frontiers 2005 12 1 281-287. 5 C / / 2005 271 272. LIU Xin-ting ZHENG Quan-li. Study on five main earthquakes mechanism in global century C / /The 21 # Annual Meeting Symposium for China Geophysical 2005 271 272. 4. J. 2010 32 1 150-160. WEI Bai-lin HE Hong-lin GUO Liang-tian et al. On the causes of earthquake-generated tsunami J. Seismology and Geology 2010 32 1 150-160. 1 6.
696 30 J. 2008 26 2 59-64. TAO Chun-hui DAI Li-ming SUN Yao et al. Summary on the tectonic setting of the area around Indonesia where earthquake tsunami happened J. Journal of Marine Sciences 2008 26 2 59-64. 7. 8. 0 -some scientific questions of mining safety J. Physics 2007 36 2 136-145. J. 2008 28 4 7-12. 13. JIAO Qing YANG Xuan-hui XU Li-qing et al. Prelim- J. inary study on motion characteristics of Longmenshan fault before and after Ms 8. 0 Wenchuan earthquake J. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics. 2008 28 4 7-12. 8. 2010 J. Global Geology 2009 28 4 513-518. J. 2010 3 1-7. REN Jun-jie ZHOU Na. The 2010 M 8. 8 Chile earthquake the historic earthquakes and the tectonic setting J. Recent Developments in World Seismology 2010 3 1-7. 6 109-112. CAI Cheng-gong WANG You-an. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of general regularity of coal and gas out- 9. burst J. China Safety Science Journal 1997 14 SD 2 6 109-112. J. 2009 28 3 339-344. JIA Jian-liang LIU Zhao-jun CHEN Yong-cheng et al. Lithologic prediction and application of log-constrained seismic -an example from SD 2 segment of Dalianhe Formation in Tangyuan fault depression J. Global Geology 2009 28 3 339-344. 10. D. 2008 1-8. J. 2007 16 YANG Xiu-mei. Geological hazard risk assessment 4 86-88. LI Wen JI Hong-guang WEI Xiao-wen. Research pro- based on GIS master's degree thesis D. Lanzhou Lanzhou University 2008 1-8. gress on the classification mechanism and prediction of mine rock burst J. China Mining Magazine 2007 16 4 86-88. 11. ZHANG Hong-wei CHEN Xue-hua CHENG Wu-yi et J. 2010 38 1 7-13. LI Xi-jian LIN Bai-quan. Status of research and analysis on coal and gas outburst mechanism J. Coal Geology and Exploration 2010 38 1 7-13. 12. J. 2007 36 2 136-145. LI Shi-yu HE Xue-song PAN Ke et al. Relationship between mining seismicity and gas outburst in coal mine 2009 28 4 513-518. WANG Zhao-guo LIU Cai FENG Xuan et al. Earthquake space distribution and its relationships with main faults deep structure and stress field in Northeast China 14. J. 1997 14 15. M. 2009 74. ZHANG Hong-wei HAN Jun SONG Wei-hua et al. Geo-dynamic division M. Beijing China Coal Industry Publishing House 2009 74. 16. GIS 17. J. 1998 17 4 353-357. al. Tectonics stress and coal and gas outburst J. Journal of Liaoning Technical University 1998 17 4 353-357.