2014 6 3 Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University Jun.,2014 No.3 ( 厦 门 大 学 中 文 系, 福 建 厦 门 361005) :,, HSK, : ; ; ; :H193.4 :A :1007-3558(2014)03-0010-08 The Discrimination of Chinese Synonyms " " and " " and the Contrast of Their Corresponding Thai Words Ye Guiying (Xiamen University, Fujian 361005, P.R. China) Abstract: this paper differentiates and analyzes the lexical and grammatical meaning of the Chinese synonyms and. It found out the similarities and difference of the two and the corresponding Thai words. Based on the HSK dynamic composition corpus in the survey, this paper analyzes the type of learner errors in the study of Thai languague and reasons of the errors, and finally puts forward relevant teaching strategies. Key words: synonyms; and ; Thai words; teaching strategies,,,, : [1],,,, :, (2009), 1 ( ), ; 2 ; 3 ; 4 ; 5 ; 6 1, ; 2 ; 3 ; 4, [2], ; 5 (2009),, (2009), :2014-03-16 : 叶 桂 瑛 (1982-), 英 文 名 YAMWONG NAMONRUT, 泰 国 人 厦 门 大 学 语 言 学 与 应 用 语 言 学 专 业 2013 级 博 士 生, 导 师 : 苏 新 春, 主 要 研 究 方 向 : 对 外 汉 语 词 汇 教 学
2014 : 11 : ( 一 ) 再 和 又 词 汇 意 义 之 同 1. : (1)(a) (b) (2)(a), (b), (1) (2) ( ),, /, (1998),,,,,, [3] (1) (2), (a), (b), (a), (b), 2. : (3) (4), (5), (6), (7) (3) (7),, ( ), (3) (4) ( ), (5), (6), (7) 3. : (8), (9) :, (8) (9), (8),, (9), 4. : (10) (11),, (10), (11), ( 二 ) 再 和 又 词 汇 意 义 之 异 1., (12) (13), (12) (13),
12 2014 2., (14) (15) (14) (15), + + 3., (16), (17), (16) (17) (16), (17) [4] (1968), (1977) [5], : (18) (19),, (2006) (2004) [6], (18),,, :,, (19),,,,,, :,, ; ; ;, ( 1-2) ( 1-2) ( 3-7) ( 18-19) ( 10-11) (2003), Ik1 ; Ik2, ; Ik3 ; Ik4 [7], (2003), : ( 一 ) 再 又 与 泰 语 词 的 词 汇 意 义 对 比 1. 1 : Ik1, 1 1 : (20) (21) Ik2 1, (22)
2014 : 13 2 : Ik3, 2,, : (23),, 3 : Ik4 3 6, (24) (25) 4 : 2, (26),, 5 : 5, : (27) :, 2. 1 : Ik1, 1 1, Ik1,, 1, 1 ( 20-21) 2 : 1, 1 Ik1, Ik1 ( 21) 3 : 4, : (28) ( 二 ) 再 又 与 泰 语 词 的 语 法 意 义 对 比 1. 1 :,,,, ( 20-27) 2 : 2, 5, ( 26-27) 2. 1 : 5( ), (Lae), (Lae) ( ), : (29) ( ), ( 5 ) 2 :, ( 20-21) 3 : 4 3,, : (30) ( )
14 2014, (31) ( ),, : 1 1, 1-3 1 6 ; 4 3,, ; 5, (Lae), (Lae) ; 2, ; 4, ; 5,, HSK, ( 一 ) 再 的 偏 误 使 用 1. (1) *, (2) *, (3) *,,, (1)- (3),,, ( ),, Ik, Ik, 2. (4) *, (5) * (4) (5),, (4), (5) (6) *, (7) *, (8) *,,, (6) (8) /,,,,, /,
2014 : 15 (9) *, (9),,,,, 3. (10) * (10),,, (10), (11) * (12) *,, (13) *,, (14) *,,, (15) *,,, (11)-(15) (11), (12), (13), (14) (15), (14), (15),, ( 二 ) 又 的 偏 误 使 用 1. (16) *, (16),,,, (17) *,,, (18) *,, (17) (18),,, 2. (19) *, (20) *,, (21) *,, (22) *,,!, (19), (20),, (21), (22),, (21) (22), 3.
16 2014 (23) *, (24) *,, (25) *, (26)* : (27) *, (28) * (23) (28), (23)-(24), (25),,,, (26) (27),, (26) (27), + + +, (28),,, HSK,,, 45.56 %, 35.56 % 18.89 % 54.05 %, 35.14 %, 10.81%,,, :1. ( 1-3,6-8,16);2. ( 4-5,9,17-22) ( 10);3. ( 11-15,23-28),,, :,,,,,,,,, Ik, :,,,,, *,,, :,,, *,,,, :,, *,,,,, + + +
2014 : 17 :,,, [8], : 1., 2. 3., 4., 5.,, : [1]. [Z]. :,2006. [2]. ( )[M]. :,2009. [3]..,1998. [4]. [M]. :,1968. [5]. AND..,1977. [6]. ( )[M]. :,2004. [7]. [M]. :Ruamsarn,2003. [8]. [J].,2008(2). ( : )!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ( 上 接 第 9 页 ) [2] ( )[M]. :,1995. [3] ( )[M]. :,1995. [4]. [M]. :,1993. [5] ( 11 )[M]. :,2011. [6]. ( 2 )[M]. :,2010. [7]. [M]. :,1998. [8] [M]. :,2010. [9],. [J]. :,2012(2). ( : )