untitled

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "untitled"

碗乐
5 years ago
Views:

1 立理論練力異例年六

4 兩年兩女念了旅旅論利利領旅了論呂論更論論諸精論更勵碌不兩年參女度女說老說老車勞累論力神力利精神力女論路年六 I

5 練力異 -- 例練力異 20 練六練練 () 刺 () 練 30 刺立 () 料 SPSS12.0 行 t 行六練異立數行異 p<.05 論 30 刺度力異練 30 刺 M=4.35 練 (M=5.05 ) 異 p<.05 兩 p<.05 練力異練 M=35.3 練 (M=29.3 ) 異 p<.05 兩 p<.05 練 II

6 立力異練立 M=7.5 練 (M=6.7 ) 異 p<.05 兩 p<.05 練力異練 M=61.8 練 (M=52.8 ) 異 p<.05 兩 p<.05 練練度力 III

7 A Research on the Differences in Strength trainings for the lower limb muscle of fencing athletes- A Case Study of Fencing Team of National Taitung Physical Education Senior High School Abstract The purpose of this research was to discuss differences in strength trainings for the specific muscle of the lower limb of fencing athletes. The research subjects were 20 fencing specialized athletes and randomly divided into a 10 people test group and a 10 people control group. The test group received a 6-week long training, the training drills include: standing jump, split-legs squat and jump, lateral box jump, backward skip, jump to box and jump from box and lunge (with epees). Before and after the training program, each test subject was tested with 30-meter sprint, side-step back and forth, standing long-jump 3 times and vertical jump (squat and jump). Collected data was analyzed with statistical software, SPSS12.0, and Paired-Samples T Test was utilized to test the difference in the outcome of the 6-week training. The significant difference level of this research is set to be p<0.05. The research conclusion is as follow: The differences in 30-meter sprint drill after strength training: After strength training, athletes in the test group after strength training showed a better outcome in 30-meter sprint test (M=4.35 sec) than they did before the training (M=5.05sec), in which the significant difference level (p<0.05) was met, and the significant difference level between the test group and the control group (p<0.05) also showed efficiency after the training. The differences in side-step test after strength training: After strength training, athletes in the test group after strength training showed a better outcome in side-step test (M=35.3times) than they did before the training (M=29.3times), in which the significant difference level (p<0.05) was met, and the significant difference level between the test group and the control group (p<0.05) also showed efficiency after the training. The differences in explosive strength of standing long-jump 3 times test after strength training: After strength training, athletes in the test group after strength training showed a better outcome in standing long-jump test (M=7.5m) than they did before the training (M=6.7m), in which the significant difference level (p<0.05) was met, and the significant difference level between the test group and the control group (p<0.05) also showed efficiency after IV

8 the training. The differences in explosive strength of vertical jump test after strength training: After strength training, athletes in the test group after strength training showed a better outcome in vertical jump test (M=61.8cm) than they did before the training (M=52.8cm), in which the significant difference level (p<0.05) was met, and the significant difference level between the test group and the control group (p<0.05) also showed efficiency after the training. Key words: strength training, fencing, speed, agility, explosive strength V

9 ...I...II Abstract... IV... VI...VIII... IX 論練理論...10 練力流...37 六料理...39 VI

10 論料練 30 刺度力 41 練力.44 練立力.46 練力六論論論參錄六練錄練度錄六練錄度錄 VII

11 4-1 料練 30 刺度力 t 刺度力數刺度力數刺數練力 t 力數數數練立力 t 立力數立力數立數練力 t 力數力數數...51 VIII

12 3-1 流刺立流 IX

13 論練力異歷獵列金 2008 來利羅利練了理理念年來露力列 1896 年林年歷 1

14 量論理論都不不度 2004 行復烈度 1996 力 muscle power 力力 Potteiger et al., 1999 力刺易不練度力練 1973 年立立年年年金年年女金年來了良 2008 來 1992 精參數更參度練不 2

15 練度練量練度都不練了更練量年 1000 練量利練力力度利練 8 12 例量練練練更刺力力練練林劉立林 2001 年來類力力力力不異練力力更利量練行力力力練 Wilson, Newton, Murphy, & Humphries,1993 練練力力練 plyoetric training 聯練 Yuri Verkhoshanski 1968 年鍊力練練練來說 3

16 力理立力 Baechle 2000 力力力度力量力練練來了利練練年練度力練力練率練來練參 4

17 練六練力練數 Neumann (1991) 理理練練度 4-6 力練力力練更率兩練練力度異練力度異 5

18 練練力度異練練力異練練度異練練異練力度異練力異練度異練異 6

19 練練拉更力練 Kritpet, 1989 練力練量量練 2002 林 1993 練 Myotatic Reflex 異練切都烈更不 2001 烈力量度力力力來力量力力力力 7

20 參力力都林 2001 力力力量力量力力力量度力量度行力良力林 1998 度度 2004 度刺歷度歷率行數六度不神神力金 1990 說神 8

21 力林 2008 力 (Baumgartner & Jackson, 1991) 說立 20 練 2009 年 2 3 練了練異狀度力力力量力異六力立參類年 9

22 了練力異理論練理論練力練練理論練練練來不益諸力練力力 1960 年異練力力練練 Plyometrics 來臘 Pleythyein 更量 Radcliffe & Farentino, 年聯 Plyometrics 練來度力量神力力練 1965 年離拉力量力量量更聯 10

23 練 Yuri Verkhoshanski 1972 年離立 1975 年 Plyometrics Fred Wlit Chu and Plummer 1984 離立力練理拉離更力 Bosco 1982 離量練連力量度 Explosive-reaction Strengch-Shortening-Cycle SSC 立力 Stretch Reflex 利益練理論 Plyometrics 練力量力力更練 Lundin, 1985 離兩練練更力量力 O Bryant, 1985 Plyometrics 理論 SSC 1 離 eccentric phase 狀拉離 2 連 coupling time 離 3concentric phase 11

24 狀度力量力量量更利了神力 Plyometrics 度離度 Plyometrics (2007) Plyometrics 力量 Plyometrics 利 SSC 力林 2004 Plyometrics 離拉理離拉立力量力量量離力力拉拉度力練力練力量力量力力量度利量力量 2003 林 2004 練離兩練練更力力力度力量力力量度行力度不切 12

25 練神力練練離練不神刺神神力力力練 2002 盧 2000 力練力了力練力離更力量 2002 盧 2000 練練兩力行練林 2002 練狀年練 1RM % 練 Chu 1992 練練量 1 3 Von Duvillard 1990 練 13

26 兩 set 1 4 數 5-10 Baechle 2000 練練行力理練練理量練率度量練度量練練不益力力良不練力量練力練理練來行不練度練力力力練力更力力量度力力力量度力量度力林 2004 力量力量數量力量 14

27 力力理來不度力量力度力量不力力度力力 1998 力 Extensor 力離更練 Squat Jump : 滑離 (Counter Movement Jump) 刺類 Drop Jump 欄練年力力練行 Costello 1986 練來刺力度練列冷李兩練練連 6 練練力力力 15

28 2006 練力 14 練練 30 刺連立度 35 兩立力 2008 不練力 21 CMJ A B C 5% 10% 0% 量行練練 CMJ 欄練行 5 逹練李 2004 力練力力參 14 行六練練力行練 60R.P.M 行 R.P.M. 行 15 力力 2007 力練力練立蓮 12 練練立 16

29 力練練逹異 2003 年練 32 兩練行立立練劉參練練行力練練連刺連度都論不力練年力力度練 100 刺立練兩練練 10 連欄兩練練度力 Marshall and Gleddie 1996 行練練力了 25% 了 2.14 福

30 練六練刺立都逹李倫 2003 練量練連 16 練量練練量連力兩逹力練練量練 1982 力練力度力神度六練力練練練 10 連欄連立 30 刺練練 18

31 度不刺不例了精烈來類類不來力歷年拉了神神見類了了留 2001 說 1896 年年黎女年女兩更 19

32 1957 年年 1969 年立 1973 年立 1983 年 1984 年參 23 洛年年來益不 1989 年女 1990 北 2003 年年女金 2006 年年 2007 年年女金女更女列 2008 理離力 2007 練理力度力量練林 2001 類類裡良力力 20

33 讀來刺刺都力度力力力良力量度靈李 2005 烈力異不劉 1998 神烈不行行領靈理神 2000 練 1996 刺刺刺刺不不都立都 21

34 念理理練靈練力賈 2005 陸練賈 2005 理力度離力量度力都 2007 流利力見了力量流更良力力力力力離度力力行力 2002 離度度離度度 2007 不力神力更力量 22

35 力刺刺度刺力刺離刺 2001 力力度力力良力狀靈力祥 2009 練練數來連串精行 1. 力力路離刺 1996 凌 2003 了量更烈度力量力量練 2. 力 23

36 1998 女刺異刺力度力女刺離逹凌 2003 刺更利 2002 年刺刺離 1.66 刺度力量更練 1996 練不練力力量力力 2006 了離更不刺力力了力量更力良力年行力練 2006 練力 24

37 力量力度不度練力力不力不 2001 刺力練若練力力來說不力 2007 行力 0.25 理論絶度度都刺力度力離離來說刺都離來 2001 玲 2000 利逹刺了律律律 2007 靈了 25

38 離行六度力陸 1996 力量度刺例力量度力度力量不刺力讀力力異良力力神了練度力練度力練力度力 26

39 說六流六料理度度 ~ 行料讀理理論 ~ 論論更練 ~ 練參練錄度練 ~ 練立練度數 27

40 練練數練錄度錄見練錄練 ~ 練 2009 年 1 行錄六行料理 ~ 料錄立料行列論 ~ 料論論 28

41 流 3-1 流練度練練料練六料料論論 3-1 流 29

42 20 10 六了不行練六了行練練錄兩料量年 30 刺立利行行六練 30

43 立 20 年 3-5 年了流 2009 年 1 20 六立立館練 2009 年年 3 16 六立立館 31

44 2009 年 3 16 立立館行料刺立量 HW-999 量量量量數錄 cmkg 數刺度量 SEIKOSO 量立刺 30 令 32

45 錄數刺刺度刺兩兩數錄量 SEIKOSO 量女行立 33

46 兩令立行立錄 20 數錄不錄離 1.2 女 1.0 兩數錄 34

47 立力量利量立立兩落連量落錄連離錄數錄不離離不連不論不不 3-4 立 3-4 立量兩數錄 35

48 力量量立量行力錄兩度度立度量兩數錄 36

49 流流 3-6 流狀錄不 30 不度行行來行流 3-6 行量練量行 30 刺立力行 37

50 說料 30 刺立練 () 六 30 刺立料理 36 流 38

51 六料理數行 SPSS for Windows 行料異 p.05 料量行列料數來年 t 行練 30 刺異練異練立異練異立數行 30 刺度力異力異立力異 p.05 39

52 論六練力異六練料 t 立數行料料練 30 刺度力練力練立力練力六論料兩料 4-1 利練六練不練六都利 40

53 4-1 料數 N=10 3.8± ± ± ± ±8.3 N=10 2.6± ± ± ± ±6.2 練 30 刺度力 30 刺度力異利 t 練異立數度力異理 4-2 練 30 刺度力 M N SD t 練練 * * p t 5.45 P.05 異見練 41

54 練 30 刺不練 30 刺 M=4.35 練 30 刺 M= 刺度力數異來 SS df MS F 數 g*s Error n.s.p 刺度力行數數 * F P.05 逹 30 刺 30 刺不理度力不異不度力行立數 42

55 刺度力數異來 SS df MS F ( ) ( ) * Error() * p 刺立數 F =5.573 P.05 理異良練刺數數 ( ) 數刺數練 30 43

56 刺數數練力力異利 t 練異立數力異理 4-6 練力 M N SD t 練練 * * p t P.05 異見練練不練 M=35.3 練 (M=29.3) 44

57 4-7 力數異來 SS df MS F 數 g*r Error n.s.p 力行數數 * F.312P.05 逹不理力不異不力行立數 4-8 數異來 ( ) ( ) * Error() 立數 F =4.901 P 45

58 .05 理異良練 4-9 數數 ( ) 數數練數數練立力立力異利 t 練異立數力異理 46

59 4-10 練立力 M N SD t 練練 * * p t P.001 異見練練立不練立 M=7.5 練立 M= 立力數異來 SS df MS F 數 g*l Error n.s.p 立力行數數 * F P.05 逹立立不理力不異不力 47

60 行立數 4-12 立力數異來 SS df MS F * Error * p 立立數 F =19.97P.05 理異良練 4-13 立數數數

61 立數練立數數練力力異利 t 練異立數力異理 4-14 練力 M N SD t 練練 * * p t P.01 異見練練不練 M=61.8 練刺 M=

62 4-15 力數異來 SS df MS F 數 (g*h) Error() n.s.p 力行數數 * F 1.43P.05 逹不理力不異不力行立數 4-16 力數異來 SS df MS F ) * Error * p 立數 50

63 F =16.56 P.05 理異良練 4-17 數數 ( ) 數數練數數六論六練力異料練論練度力異度來說力六 51

64 練刺異 p 練異 p.05 練 30 刺度力劉練刺連度都不力練年力力度練力異來說力六練異 p.056 練異 p.05 練力 Costello 1986 練來刺力度練力異六練立異 p

65 練異 p.05 練立力年練立 56 練年力福 1997 練六練刺立都逹練度力論練力更若不度練練更力力 53

66 論論論練力異立 10 行六練料 SPSS 12.0 for Windows 行論六練度力良六練力良六練力良 54

67 論列來參練練行練力來力練力不來練不年 55

68 參 2006 不北刺立論論立冷李 2003 力練女力來 2008/11/ 北李倫 2003 練量練連論立練金 1990 練理省省練李 2005 力李 2004 力練力力力量練 56

69 林 1993 理北行林 1998 理北林劉立林 2001 練 Bompa, T. O. 北林 2002 練力刺力林 2004 力練北林 2008 La New 練論立 2007 年理練 2003 年練福理力練林北 2007 Plyometrics 力練力練練

70 2000 練力力力練 1998 年練凌 2003 力力力玲 2000 論練度力論北立立 2008 不練力論立練 1994 度羽練練北 1991 力賈練 58

71 練練力練林林林 2004 力練 Baechle, T. R. & Roger, W. E. 北 2002 練理論劉 1998 福劉 2003 不力練年力度年度立盧 2000 練理論練力論立練祥 2009 力遼寧福 1997 練力北力

72 Baechle,T. R., & Earle, R. (2000). Essentials of strength training and conditioning (2 nd ed.), pp Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Bosco,C.et al.(1982). Effect of elastic enerage and myoelectric Potentiation of triceps surea during stretch-shortening cycle exercise. Interntional Journal of Sport Medicine. 2, Baumgartner, T. A., & Jackson, A. S. (1991). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers. hu,d.a.,& Plummer, L.(1984). The language of plyometrics. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal,6(5), Costello, F. (1986). Roundtable: Practical considerations for utilizing plyometric. National Strength and Conditioning Association, 8(3), Kritpet, T.T. (1989). The effects of six weeks of squat & plyometric training on power production. Unpublished master s thesis, Oregon state University. Lundin, P.(1985). Areview of plyometric training. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 7, Marshall, D.& Gleddi, N (1996).Plyometric training for basketball. National Strength & Conditionong 60

73 Association Journal,18, Miller,B. P. (1982). The effect of plyometric training on the vertical jump performance of adult female subjects. British Journal of Sport Medicine, 16, 113. Neumann, G. (1991). Zur Leistung stru Ktur der Kurz-und Mittelzeitausdaure-Sportarten aus sportmedizinischer Sicht. Leistungssport O Bryant, H. S. (1985). Roundtable: Determiming factors of strength-part Π. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 7, Potteiger, J. A., Lockwood, R. H., Haub, M. D., Dolezal, B. A., Almuzaini, K. S., Schroeder, J. M., & Zebas, C. J.,(1999). Muscle power and fiber characteristics following 8 weeks of plyometric training. Journal of Strength Conditioning Research, 13, Radcliffe, J.C. & Farentinos, R.C. (1985) Plyometrics:Explosive power training(2 nd ed), pp champaign,il:human kinetics Publishers,Ins. Von Duvillard, S.(1990). Plyometrics for speed and explosiveness. School Coach, 8, Wilson, G. J., Newton, R. U., Murphy, A. J., & Humphries, B. J., (1993). The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 5,

74 錄六練六練練參力練林 2004 練量練數度練練數數數立立六數數立立

75 參料來練林 2004 力練練練行行 2 練 3 數 15 兩練練量

76 錄練度論練力異例立理聯聯練六練力兩練練力度異練力度異立立參兩兩六行練 64

77 練度見六練練參力練林 2004 練練數度量練練度見數數數不不不立不立不不不不刺不刺參料來練林 2004 力練 65

78 錄六練練行練練數數數立立刺六數數立

79 立刺刺參料來練林 2004 力練練練行行 2 練 3 數 15 兩練練量

80 錄度沈易利立立立呂老練老蘭老立里老立劉老立李老北立 68

81 錄練力異例說益不參列參了流參行 30 刺立 30 料絶參欄列年立理 69

untitled

untitled 年說說度度六北聯 1 說 2008 年 5 12 2 28 陸省都北 92 里 8 烈都陸 68,712 罹 17,912 143,367 1,100 省北 1,100 累數 4,600 2 兩立聯烈 12 立陸北聯了陸參 13 率金 30 陸 15 747 益 50 北都兩 16 北理率領 22 兩都流立 30 里 -- 行 3 16