中国封闭式基金折价问题研究
|
|
- 酸班霏 莫
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 panel GARCH EGARCH 3 EGARCH - -
2 LIQUIDITY 5.. MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE THEORY 5..3 INVESTOR SENTIMENT THEORY RATIONAL EXPECTATION THEORY 6..4 MARKET FRICTIONS
3 EGARCH EGARCH 44 7 EGARCH 45 8 EGARCH
4 . closed-end fund NAV pricei NAVi D i = NAV i. LeeShleifer Thaler99-4 -
5 3... liquidiy proxy for liquidiy Daar.. managerial performance heory sock selecion marke iming Chay Trzcinka
6 ..3 invesor senimen heory raional expecaion heory DeLongShleiferSummers Waldmann99 noise rader LeeShleifer Thaler99 DSSW, Chandar Paro closed-end counry funds Kyle985 O Hara marke fricions raional explanaion - 6 -
7 .3 panel GARCHEGARCH 3 EGARCH - 7 -
8 . 3 3 ) % 6 5 ) % %5.97% 3) Skewness ) 3 9 lepokuric (playkuric)
9 n D D = α + β + ε. D D D = a + ) D ( β + ε. ε β = D DickeyFuller β = ) ) D + ε = D 3) 57 D.. D i Pi NAV i = NAV i W i n i = NAV i NAV Pi i = m i i m i, DI = n i = W i NAVi i Di i mi Wi i n DI D i, - 9 -
10
11 % A
12 (invesor senimen) DeLongShleiferSummers Waldmann(99), LeeShleifer Thaler(99)DSSW :, % - -
13 .3. Likelihood Raio *.* *.9*.9* * 3.86*.97* 9.4* * * 8.3* * 9.53* 8.3* * 6.63*.53*.* 4.* * * 5.55* * 6.66* * * 5%
14 3 3. privae informaion noise ( v N p,σ (, σ ) N ~ v ) - 4 -
15 O Hara(997) Single-Aucion Model agen v x x + p p x + p = P x + π = ( v p) x P ( ) ( x + ) = E[ v x + ] ( ) X o X (O) v E [ π ( X () o, P) v~ = v] > E[ π ( X ( o), P) v~ = v Kyle Kyle985 () v = β ( v p ) = α + βv x = X 3. α = βp ( x + ) = p + λ( + ) P = P x 3. β = Σ σ λ = Σ σ ] - 5 -
16 3. laws of condiional disribuions of normally disribued random variables ~v ϑ ~ γ ( ~ N, σ ) ( ϑ ~ N ~,Σ ) E() v p ( ) = x + α + βp ~ γ x + ~ = E Σ Σ Σ Σ βσ = = Σ Σ βσ σ + β Σ λ = βσ σ + β Σ P( x + ) = E = p = p ( ) ( ) ( vγ ) = + Σ Σ ( γ ) βσ + σ + β Σ + λγ ( γ α βp ) 3.3 ~ π = E = ( v ~ d ~ π = dβ σ β = ( ) λ = Σ σ {[ v P( x + ) x] v = v~ } = E{ [ v ( P )] x v v~ + λγ = } β x P ) x σ + β / x( σ + β ( σ + β ) β ) ~ π ) x x σ β x = ( σ + β x x σ β = 3.3 Σ E ~,Σ ( ) () ( ) ϑ = ϑ,ϑ N Σ () ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ϑ ϑ ) = + Σ Σ ( ϑ ) - 6 -
17 ( x + ) = p + λ( x + ) P ( v) = ( v ) x = X β θ x + = v p + = β ( ) p θ β + p = v + β 3.4 β Z θ β + p = v + Z v ( σ ) Z, ( v, ) Z v ~ N β σ N ~ Z v Bayes Learning Rule p p = p Σ + Z ( β σ ) Σ + β σ ( Σ + β σ ) Σ = β pσ + σ Z p = = β + σ + σ ( p + Z ) = ( p + θ p ) θ = x + λ = Σ p = p = p σ x + + β σ + Σ ( x + ) = p + λ( x + ) x = β ( v p ) - 7 -
18 x = Σ σ ( v p ) 3.5 x π = E [( v P ] ( ) ) x = Σ σ 3.6 σ 3.3 λ x p x densiy p convoluion σ / σ p ( ) + = p + v p 3.7 σ Σ Σ p p v - 8 -
19 Σ = Σ β + σ β Σ = Σ σ σ + σ = Σ 3.8 v 5% p v v p ( ) N p,σ N ( p Σ ) 3.7 v, p [ p v] ( p ) E = v v v 3.4 θ β + p = v + β β T θ + T p = v + T = T = β T = T 3. T Srong Law of Large numbers E T T = T θ T T T = p = v T [ p v] E[ p v] = lim p v = T T = - 9 -
20 v - -
21 Yi =a+agmi+ajyri+a3fhi+a4jzdi+a5idxi+a6vi+a7kmxsi+i (4.) Y. ε i GM 3, ) JYR ) FH 3) JZD % - -
22 % % % 4. 4 JZD = I d + I d I d i i 4. I i d i 4) IDX 5) V 6) KMXS 4.. 5: Variable Number Parial Model 4. Sep Enered Label Vars In R-Square R-Square C(p) F Value Pr > F GM GM <. JYR JYR <. 3 FH FH <. 4 JZD JZD IDX IDX V V
23 4. Parameer Sandard Variable Label DF Esimae Error Value Pr > GM GM <. JYR JYR <. FH FH <. JZD JZD Y = GM.4378log( JYR) +.36FH. 3384JZD i i i i ) ) 3),,,,,, 3-3 -
24 4. 4) (999 ) Parameer Sandard Variable Label DF Esimae Error Value Pr > Inercep Inercep <. IDX IDX GM GM FH FH JZD JZD
25 Parameer Sandard Variable Label DF Esimae Error Value Pr > GM GM <. FH FH <. JYR JYR <. JZD JZD P. A,,,,, A 4.3 EGARCH 985 Kyle - 5 -
26 Kyle,985 4 BreadhWidh (Deph) 3 Resiliency 4 (Immediacy) 3,
27 GARCH ---EGARCH EGARCH Nelson(99)GARCH, Black Chrisie (Leverage Effec) h ε i Nelson99 GARCH EGARCH EGARCH h ε. i R = i= γ R i + ε log( h ) = var( ε ) = a + r z = ε / i h q i= a log( h i ) + λ p i i= z - + θ p i i= z EGARCHM R γ + h Z 4.4 = c + R + βv + β V + β 3V3-7 -
28 3 = a + ( a j ln h j + λ j Z j + θ jz j ) + ϖ V + ϖ V + ϖ 3V + ξ j= ln h 3 R ln P ln P lnt4.5 P V V V 3 T h Z EGARCHM 68 ) R R-.3.5 ) V ) (V3) 4 4) θ RES/SQR[GARCH]()RES/SQR[GARCH]() RES/SQR[GARCH](3) θ
29 - 5) 6 89 T V dv P d ln EGARCH-M Z h Z V h h dv P d ln ϖ β β + = + = 4.6 h Z ) ln ( β = dv P d E ) ( 4 ) ln ( h E dv P d D ϖ = 4.7 ) ( 4 h E ϖ n i i i dv P S d ) ln( = V S i i i V V χ = i χ i i i n i i i i n i i i i n i i n i i i dv P d P S dv P d P S dv dp S dv P S d ln ln χ = = = = = = =
30 χ i S i i = n i= S P i P i d dv n i= S i P i / n i= S i P i d ln P n i = χ i i= dvi d ln n S P d ln P = 4.9 i i n n i= i E( ) E( χ i ) E( ) = χ i β i dv i= dvi i= n d ln Si Pi n n i= 4 d ln Pi 4 D( = χ i D = χ i wi E( hi ) dv dv 4 i= i i= - 3 -
31 5-3 -
32 Sharpe Jensen Treynor - 3 -
33 - 33 -
34
35 . Alan K. Severn, 998, Closed-end funds and senimen risk, Review of Financial Economics 7, No Bollerslev T., 986, Generalized auoregressive condiional heeroskedasiciy, Journal of Economerics 3, Brauer, Gregory, 998, A closed-end fund shares abnormal reurns and he informaion conen of discouns and premiums, Journal of Finance 43, Charles M.C. L, Anderei S. and Richard H.T, 99, Invesor senimen and he closed-end fund puzzle, Journal of Finance, Vol XLVI. 5. Chay J.B. and Charles A.T., 999, Managerial performance and cross-secional pricing of closed-end fund, Journal of financial economics 5, Chen Nai-fu, Raymond K., Meron H and Miller, 993, Are he discouns on closed-end funds a senimen index?, Journal of Finance 48, De Long, J.B., Shleifer A., Summers L. H., and Waldmann R. J., 99, Noise rader risk in financial markes, Journal of Poliical Economy 98, Dilip K.P.,, Measuring performance of he inernaional closed-end fund, Journal of Banking and Finance 5, John E. Richard, James B. Wiggins,, The informaion conen of closed-end counry fund discouns, Financial Services Review 9, Kyle, A.S., Coninuous aucions and insider rading, 985, Economerica 53, pp Lee, Charles MC., Shleifer A. and Thaler R. H., 999, Invesor senimen and he closed-end fund puzzle, Journal of Finance 46, Maddala G.S., 998, Inroducion o economerics, nd Ediion. 3. Chandar N. and Paro D. C., Why do closed-end counry funds rade a enormous premiums during currency crises?, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 8, Neal R. and Whealey S.M., 998, Adverse selecion and bid-ask spreads: evidence from closed-end Fund, Journal of Financial Marke,
36 5. O Hara and Maureem, Marke microsrucure heory, 997, Blackwell Publishers Inc. 6. Olienyk J.P., Schwebach R.G. and Zumwal J. K., 999, WEBS, SPDRS, and Counry Funds: an analysis of inernaional coinegraion, Journal of Mulinaional Financial Managemen 9, Daar V.,, Impac of liquidiy on premia/discouns in closed-end funds, The Quarerly Review of Economics and Finance 4,
37 % -.53% -8.67% -.8% -7.83% -6.7% -9.36% -4.8% 3.35%-4.79%-.9%-.6%-.75%.89% 53.5% 8.9% -.65%-5.3% -9.59% -.% -8.73% -.% -9.% -4.93%.76%-5.56%-.96% -8.96%-3.%.87% 46.6% 5.77% % 9.%.5% 8.33% 8.9%.8% 6.% 8.7% 5.9% 6.7% 7.43% 8.5% 5.77% 5.78% 7.76% 8.89% -4.39%-5.53%-4.9%-4.79%-.44%-.86%-.9%-36.3% 3.46%-5.5%-3.6%-8.3%-3.5% -6.7% 9.87% 6.85% 6.4% 3.% 6.8% 4.76% 9.77% 4.35% -.9% 7.4% 6.66%.%.46% 6.39% -5.% 8.3% 9.7% 47.3% 5.53% 8.53% 5.7% 39.55% 5.% 36.% 9.% 43.7% 3.9% 6.6% 5.7% 44.7% 8.5% 34.39% 6.4% 4.38% % -.5% -.6% -.3% -.3% -6.5% 6.49% 6.43% -4.55%-3.9%-3.93% 8.7% 9.57% 8.64%.3% -9.9% -.9%-3.68%-.6%-.84%-.7% -7.33% 6.3% -4.8%-3.57%-4.79% 6.6% 8.66% 7.33%.% % 8.93% 9.4% 8.75% 8.3% 49.37% 5.97% 3.4% 7.% 5.34% 6.6% 6.93% 5.7% 5.79% 6.7% -3.74%-5.4%-5.86%-3.79%-4.77%-6.38%-3.% -.7% -5.93%-3.3%-3.99% 9.66%.6%.% 4.5% 3.97% 3.55% 8.5% 8.45% 5.85% 473.% 54.%.99% 7.%.37%.84% 35.99% 3.6%.86% 38.5% 55.7% 48.96% 44.% 4.4% 4.6% 499.6% 77.4% 3.7% 33.5% 5.69% 6.83% 6.33% 3.%.85% 34.% Level T * -6.39* -5.86* -7.5* -6.55* -.9* -5.43* -6.57* -7.44* -5.58* * -5.84* -3.88* T Level T * -4.7* -5.95* -6.9* -7.43* * -5.3* -5.34* -6.* -5.34* * -6.5* T
38 3 D5 D5 D53 D55 D56 D58 D56D57 D59 D5D55 D58 D4688 D4689 D469 D469 D469 D4693 D4695 D4698 D4699 D47 D5 D5.746 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
39 4 98/6/3 98/9/3 98//3 99/3/3 99/6/3 99/9/3 99//3 /3/3 /6/3 /9/3 //3 /3/3 /6/3 /9/ *
40
41 5 The REG Procedure Model: MODEL Dependen Variable: Y Y Forward Selecion: Sep Variable GM Enered: R-Square =.337 and C(p) = Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F Model <. Error Correced Toal Parameer Sandard Variable Esimae Error Type II SS F Value Pr > F Inercep E E-6.. GM <. Bounds on condiion number:, Forward Selecion: Sep Variable JYR Enered: R-Square =.454 and C(p) = Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F Model <. Error Correced Toal Parameer Sandard Variable Esimae Error Type II SS F Value Pr > F Inercep 5.967E E-7.. GM <. JYR <. Bounds on condiion number:.4,
42 Forward Selecion: Sep 3 Variable FH Enered: R-Square =.487 and C(p) =.365 Model <. Error Correced Toal Parameer Sandard Variable Esimae Error Type II SS F Value Pr > F Inercep GM <. JYR <. FH <. Bounds on condiion number:.79,.95 Forward Selecion: Sep 4 Variable JZD Enered: R-Square =.4949 and C(p) = 5.79 Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F Model <. Error Correced Toal Parameer Sandard Variable Esimae Error Type II SS F Value Pr > F Inercep GM <. JYR <. FH <. JZD Bounds on condiion number:.437,
43 Forward Selecion: Sep 5 Variable IDX Enered: R-Square =.4985 and C(p) = Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F Model <. Error Correced Toal Parameer Sandard Variable Esimae Error Type II SS F Value Pr > F Inercep IDX GM <. JYR <. FH <. JZD Bounds on condiion number:.996, 3.86 Forward Selecion: Sep 6 Variable V Enered: R-Square =.53 and C(p) = 6.4 Analysis of Variance Sum of Mean Source DF Squares Square F Value Pr > F Model <. Error Correced Toal Parameer Sandard Variable Esimae Error Type II SS F Value Pr > F Inercep IDX GM <. JYR <. FH <. JZD V Bounds on condiion number:.77, 5.46 No oher variable me he.5 significance level for enry ino he model
44 6 6 EGARCH c (6) P P P P P P P P P P R(-) V V V C RES /SQR[GARCH]() RES/SQR[GARCH]() RES /SQR[GARCH](). RES/SQR[GARCH](). RES /SQR[GARCH](3). RES/SQR[GARCH](3). EGARCH() EGARCH() EGARCH(3)..7. T V V V
45 7 EGARCH () P P P P P P P P P P R(-) V V V C RES /SQR[GARCH]() RES/SQR[GARCH]() RES /SQR[GARCH]() RES/SQR[GARCH]() RES /SQR[GARCH](3) RES/SQR[GARCH](3) EGARCH() EGARCH() EGARCH(3) T V V V
46 8 EGARCH () P P P P P P P P P P R(-) V V V C RES /SQR[GARCH]() RES/SQR[GARCH]() RES /SQR[GARCH]() RES/SQR[GARCH]() RES /SQR[GARCH](3).7 RES/SQR[GARCH](3) -.7 EGARCH() EGARCH() EGARCH(3).5 T V V V
47 9 Bea 53 4,85, % ,968, % ,95, % ,99, %.74E ,957, % ,869, % ,533, % ,63, % ,899, % ,547, % bea 4 7,9, % ,8, % ,79, % ,53, % ,633,6.4 3.% ,76, % ,4,. 3.5% ,366, % ,95, % ,9, % Bea 68 35,936, ,7, ,49, ,65, ,946, ,47, ,584, ,95, ,3, ,6,
中国沪深股票市场流动性研究
1 1.1 1.2 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5 bid-ask bidask 1 2 2-1 L RISK Madhavan(1992) JN L JN L 1 2 GARCH 1 1.1 commonaliy rade mechanism 1.1.1 marke microsrucure Garmam(1976), KrausSoll (1972) NWSE
More informationVaR 3.1 VaR 3.2 VaR
D 1 1. 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 3. VaR 3.1 VaR 3.2 VaR 3.3 4. 2 VaR VaR a-garch VaR Black-Scholes 1., 1998 VaR VaR-covered porfolio insurance 3 Upside Capure 2 Perold and Sharpe 1988 Rubinsein 1985 Black
More information深圳股票市场稳定性研究报告
2003. 2. 13 0067 (1) (2) S&P500 (1) 1997 S&P500 1997 (2) 1998 1999 S&P500 2000 S&P500 (3) S&P500 65% S&P500 40% (4) 1997 S&P500 SWITCH-ARCH (1) (2) 1997 (3) ST PT B (1) (2) (3) (4) ST PT I....5 II....9
More informationuntitled
Sock Volailiy Models and he Pricing of Warrans 36005 005 0 Hong & Li 005 Absrac This paper used a lo of popular volailiy models o sudy he dynamic behavior of underlying sock and hen used Hong & Lee (005)
More information- i - 1 2 W 1 W 2 W W W d(w) = d(p) + d (P) + L+ d(t) + d( σ ) + d(r) 2 P 2 P t σ R 1 2 = d(p) + Γ d (P) + L+ θ d(t) + ν d( σ) + ρ d(r) 2 Delta Delta Leland WW Delta-Gamma Delta-Gamma-Vega Michel Crouhy,
More information004 6 volailiy Hull Whie(987) vega( kappa) innovaion erm Poerba Summers(986) French, Schwer Sambaugh(987) Bollerslev, Engle Wooldridge (988) Bailie De
004 6-3 CARR(Condiional Auo-Regression Range) CARR GARCH CARR GARCH Chou(00) S P500 CARR CARR GARCH 004 6 volailiy Hull Whie(987) vega( kappa) innovaion erm Poerba Summers(986) French, Schwer Sambaugh(987)
More informationuntitled
1 2003 2 34 U L S 5 20022000 1 2 n n t t L = v r 100 = 1 t = 1 t v t tt-r t 3 1SHFE 4 2SHFE 5 6 KW DF Pr > KW KW DF Pr > KW 3 7 8 4 9 10 SHFE 1 r t+i t i t m 2 1/2 rti, i= 1 σ = ( ) t m 11 2 ADF τ Pr>
More informationΖ # % & ( ) % + & ) / 0 0 1 0 2 3 ( ( # 4 & 5 & 4 2 2 ( 1 ) ). / 6 # ( 2 78 9 % + : ; ( ; < = % > ) / 4 % 1 & % 1 ) 8 (? Α >? Β? Χ Β Δ Ε ;> Φ Β >? = Β Χ? Α Γ Η 0 Γ > 0 0 Γ 0 Β Β Χ 5 Ι ϑ 0 Γ 1 ) & Ε 0 Α
More information! # % & ( & # ) +& & # ). / 0 ) + 1 0 2 & 4 56 7 8 5 0 9 7 # & : 6/ # ; 4 6 # # ; < 8 / # 7 & & = # < > 6 +? # Α # + + Β # Χ Χ Χ > Δ / < Ε + & 6 ; > > 6 & > < > # < & 6 & + : & = & < > 6+?. = & & ) & >&
More information!! # % & ( )!!! # + %!!! &!!, # ( + #. ) % )/ # & /.
! # !! # % & ( )!!! # + %!!! &!!, # ( + #. ) % )/ # & /. #! % & & ( ) # (!! /! / + ) & %,/ #! )!! / & # 0 %#,,. /! &! /!! ) 0+(,, # & % ) 1 # & /. / & %! # # #! & & # # #. ).! & #. #,!! 2 34 56 7 86 9
More informationuntitled
26 2006 年 5 251~262 數 易 理 利 不 EGARCH 料 2003 年 1 1 2004 年 12 31 483 數 數 料 數 料 來 易 兩 領 落 1. 數 2. 數 不 易 EGARCH 論 金 數 WTO 金 流 金 金流 度 更 金 數 流 數 契 易 易來 例 易 了 易 易 易 數 行 數 易 易 領 來 了 數 參 來 不 易 易 251 26 易 更 易 利
More information《金融评论》投稿 封面
The Choice of he Inermediae Targe of Moneary Policy in China 968 993 5 0073 85957073683550599 yqzhang@cass.org.cn MM 994Q-008Q4 VECM M M GDPCPI M M M 007 VECM JEL E5C3E58 The Choice of he Inermediae Targe
More information! # % & # % & ( ) % % %# # %+ %% % & + %, ( % % &, & #!.,/, % &, ) ) ( % %/ ) %# / + & + (! ) &, & % & ( ) % % (% 2 & % ( & 3 % /, 4 ) %+ %( %!
! # # % & ( ) ! # % & # % & ( ) % % %# # %+ %% % & + %, ( % % &, & #!.,/, % &, ) ) ( % %/ ) 0 + 1 %# / + & + (! ) &, & % & ( ) % % (% 2 & % ( & 3 % /, 4 ) %+ %( %! # ( & & 5)6 %+ % ( % %/ ) ( % & + %/
More information% %! # % & ( ) % # + # # % # # & & % ( #,. %
!!! # #! # % & % %! # % & ( ) % # + # # % # # & & % ( #,. % , ( /0 ) %, + ( 1 ( 2 ) + %, ( 3, ( 123 % & # %, &% % #, % ( ) + & &% & ( & 4 ( & # 4 % #, #, ( ) + % 4 % & &, & & # / / % %, &% ! # #! # # #
More information报告总结
CFEF RR/04/0 CAViaR RR/04/0 004 CAViaR 00080 VaR VaR Engle Manganelli 999 VaR CAViaR Chow CAViaR B Engle Manganelli CAViaR Absrac: Value-a-Risk (VaR) has become a sandard ool o measure marke risk widely
More information2004 8, Gebhard,Lee Swaminahan(2000) (Discouned Residual Income Model) Fama French(1999),, Fama French(1999),,Wu, Sercu,and Chen(2000) FF ( ), ( Keire
:A 3 A ( 100871) : Fama French (1999), 1990 2001 A,, 1990 2001 :, Fama French(1999) ( ) ( FF ) FF : ( IRR on Value) ( IRR on Cos), FF, 1990 2001 A, : ;, ; (Cos of Capial), Miller Modigliani (1966) ( ),
More informationTaiwan Fuures Exchange, TAIFEX TAIFEX Taiwan Sock Index Fuures 00 4 expiraion eec S&P 500 ( ). Kawaller, Koch and Koch 987 S&P
004 May, 0 pp99-8 leehero00@yahoo.com.w 00 4 00 4 003 8 3 45 ( ) ADF ( ) Granger ( ) (VAR) (SSM) : Sudy o an invesigaion o he relaionship among Taiwan s Spo, Fuures and Opions prices -The Applicaion o
More information/ Ν #, Ο / ( = Π 2Θ Ε2 Ρ Σ Π 2 Θ Ε Θ Ρ Π 2Θ ϑ2 Ρ Π 2 Θ ϑ2 Ρ Π 23 8 Ρ Π 2 Θϑ 2 Ρ Σ Σ Μ Π 2 Θ 3 Θ Ρ Κ2 Σ Π 2 Θ 3 Θ Ρ Κ Η Σ Π 2 ϑ Η 2 Ρ Π Ρ Π 2 ϑ Θ Κ Ρ Π
! # #! % & ( ) % # # +, % #. % ( # / ) % 0 1 + ) % 2 3 3 3 4 5 6 # 7 % 0 8 + % 8 + 9 ) 9 # % : ; + % 5! + )+)#. + + < ) ( # )# < # # % 0 < % + % + < + ) = ( 0 ) # + + # % )#!# +), (? ( # +) # + ( +. #!,
More information& & ) ( +( #, # &,! # +., ) # % # # % ( #
! # % & # (! & & ) ( +( #, # &,! # +., ) # % # # % ( # Ι! # % & ( ) & % / 0 ( # ( 1 2 & 3 # ) 123 #, # #!. + 4 5 6, 7 8 9 : 5 ; < = >?? Α Β Χ Δ : 5 > Ε Φ > Γ > Α Β #! Η % # (, # # #, & # % % %+ ( Ι # %
More informationuntitled
90 Garbade ilber(1983)garbade ilber Bigman Goldfarb chechman(1983) Maberly(1985) Elam Dixon 1988 Bigman Engle Granger 1987 Johansen 1988 Johansen Juselius 1990 Lai Lai 1991 Ghosh 1993 orenbery Zapaa 1997
More information9!!!! #!! : ;!! <! #! # & # (! )! & ( # # #+
! #! &!! # () +( +, + ) + (. ) / 0 1 2 1 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 51 0 6. 6 (78 1 & 9!!!! #!! : ;!! ? &! : < < &? < Α!!&! : Χ / #! : Β??. Δ?. ; ;
More informationΡ Τ Π Υ 8 ). /0+ 1, 234) ς Ω! Ω! # Ω Ξ %& Π 8 Δ, + 8 ),. Ψ4) (. / 0+ 1, > + 1, / : ( 2 : / < Α : / %& %& Ζ Θ Π Π 4 Π Τ > [ [ Ζ ] ] %& Τ Τ Ζ Ζ Π
! # % & ( ) + (,. /0 +1, 234) % 5 / 0 6/ 7 7 & % 8 9 : / ; 34 : + 3. & < / = : / 0 5 /: = + % >+ ( 4 : 0, 7 : 0,? & % 5. / 0:? : / : 43 : 2 : Α : / 6 3 : ; Β?? : Α 0+ 1,4. Α? + & % ; 4 ( :. Α 6 4 : & %
More information&! +! # ## % & #( ) % % % () ) ( %
&! +! # ## % & #( ) % % % () ) ( % &! +! # ## % & #( ) % % % () ) ( % ,. /, / 0 0 1,! # % & ( ) + /, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 6 9 : / ;. ; % % % % %. ) >? > /,,
More information上证联合研究计划第二期课题
(a) 1 1 1.1 1.2 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 4.1 4.2 1999 4.3 2000 / 4.4 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 7 7.1 7.2 2 1999 2000 / 3 1 1.1 1997 11 2 3 1998 3 27 20 1 5 1998 3 27 20 3 3 20 2 5 1999 5 5 20
More informationuntitled
o& α P( VH VaR) = α VH V 1 α Ω X : Ω R X ( ω) ω Ω S() T K max { ST ( ) K,0} Θ Ω ρ : Θ R ρ X Θc R ρ( X + c) = ρ( X) c X Y Θ ρ( X + Y) ρ( X) + ρ( Y) λ 0 X Θ ρ( λx ) = λρ( X ) X Y Θ X Y ρ( X ) ρ( Y ) X c
More information# # # #!! % &! # % 6 & () ) &+ & ( & +, () + 0. / & / &1 / &1, & ( ( & +. 4 / &1 5,
# # # #!! % &! # % 6 & () ) &+ & ( & +, () + 0. / & / &1 / &1, & ( 0 2 3 ( & +. 4 / &1 5, !! & 6 7! 6! &1 + 51, (,1 ( 5& (5( (5 & &1 8. +5 &1 +,,( ! (! 6 9/: ;/:! % 7 3 &1 + ( & &, ( && ( )
More information! /. /. /> /. / Ε Χ /. 2 5 /. /. / /. 5 / Φ0 5 7 Γ Η Ε 9 5 /
! # %& ( %) & +, + % ) # % % ). / 0 /. /10 2 /3. /!. 4 5 /6. /. 7!8! 9 / 5 : 6 8 : 7 ; < 5 7 9 1. 5 /3 5 7 9 7! 4 5 5 /! 7 = /6 5 / 0 5 /. 7 : 6 8 : 9 5 / >? 0 /.? 0 /1> 30 /!0 7 3 Α 9 / 5 7 9 /. 7 Β Χ9
More informationuntitled
300 (ADF) (VEM) 300 2006 9 5 A50 2006 9 8 CFFEX 10 30 300 300 2007 1 19 6 3 300 300 Kawaller Koch(1987) S&P 500 S&P 500 20~45 1 Stoll Whaley(1990) ARMA 2 3 S&P 500 MMI S&P 500 MMI 5 Abhyankar(1995) FTSE
More information!! )!!! +,./ 0 1 +, 2 3 4, # 8,2 6, 2 6,,2 6, 2 6 3,2 6 5, 2 6 3, 2 6 9!, , 2 6 9, 2 3 9, 2 6 9,
! # !! )!!! +,./ 0 1 +, 2 3 4, 23 3 5 67 # 8,2 6, 2 6,,2 6, 2 6 3,2 6 5, 2 6 3, 2 6 9!, 2 6 65, 2 6 9, 2 3 9, 2 6 9, 2 6 3 5 , 2 6 2, 2 6, 2 6 2, 2 6!!!, 2, 4 # : :, 2 6.! # ; /< = > /?, 2 3! 9 ! #!,!!#.,
More information4= 8 4 < 4 ϑ = 4 ϑ ; 4 4= = 8 : 4 < : 4 < Κ : 4 ϑ ; : = 4 4 : ;
! #! % & ( ) +!, + +!. / 0 /, 2 ) 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 8 9 : 9 ;< 9 = = = 4 ) > (/?08 4 ; ; 8 Β Χ 2 ΔΔ2 4 4 8 4 8 4 8 Ε Φ Α, 3Γ Η Ι 4 ϑ 8 4 ϑ 8 4 8 4 < 8 4 5 8 4 4
More information., /,, 0!, + & )!. + + (, &, & 1 & ) ) 2 2 ) 1! 2 2
! # &!! ) ( +, ., /,, 0!, + & )!. + + (, &, & 1 & ) ) 2 2 ) 1! 2 2 ! 2 2 & & 1 3! 3, 4 45!, 2! # 1 # ( &, 2 &, # 7 + 4 3 ) 8. 9 9 : ; 4 ), 1!! 4 4 &1 &,, 2! & 1 2 1! 1! 1 & 2, & 2 & < )4 )! /! 4 4 &! &,
More information( ) : ,,, 10 %,,, :,,,,, : (1) ; (2), ; (3), ; (4), ; (5) ( ), (2003),,,,,,, , 20,, ST,,,, :? ( ) 3 ( ) 77
2005 4 3 ( 100084) : 1998 2002,,, 10 %,,, :,,,,, : (1) ; (2), ; (3), ; (4),; (5) ( ),(2003),,,,,,, 1997 1, 20,, ST,,,,:? ( ) 3 (70473046) 77 :,?,, Modigliani Miller (1958), Jensen Meckling (1976),Grossman
More information, ( 6 7 8! 9! (, 4 : : ; 0.<. = (>!? Α% ), Β 0< Χ 0< Χ 2 Δ Ε Φ( 7 Γ Β Δ Η7 (7 Ι + ) ϑ!, 4 0 / / 2 / / < 5 02
! # % & ( ) +, ) %,! # % & ( ( ) +,. / / 01 23 01 4, 0/ / 5 0 , ( 6 7 8! 9! (, 4 : : ; 0.!? Α% ), Β 0< Χ 0< Χ 2 Δ Ε Φ( 7 Γ Β Δ 5 3 3 5 3 1 Η7 (7 Ι + ) ϑ!, 4 0 / / 2 / 3 0 0 / < 5 02 Ν!.! %) / 0
More information# ( + + # + # 6 +,! + # +! +, + # ( + ) ( + ( + ) + 7! + # + /8 + ) ( +! + #. + ( +, +! + # + # + + ( ! ( + ) ( + ) +, + ( + 9% +! +, + ( +
! ## % & (! ) # (! + ) (, ( + ) ( +! ( + + # + #! + ( + + ( + ) ( + + ( + # + ) +! ( + ( + # +! ( + ) + # ( + ) + # +! ( +. + / 0. + ( + # + # + +, + ) + + ) + 1!, ( 2 1 # 3 )! # ( 4 5 #3 (! # ( 4 # #
More information%! # # % % & # ( ) ( +, & +, +, & +, & +, +, &!
%! # # % % & # ( ) ( +, & +, +, & +, & +, +, &! & &./ 0 # #1 # 2! +, 3 4 4 +,!!!! 4 4 4 4 4 56 7 89 #! 4! 4 4! 4 4! 14 #: 2 4! +,! +, 14 4 ; < = ( 4 < = +14 # : 1 1 4 # : : 3 # (4,! / +, +, +, > +,? 3
More informationMarkowitz 1952 DOT(designated order turnaround) ESP(exchange stock portfolio) ( ) , side car ETFExchange Traded Fund ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF
ETF :David Voon : : 1 Markowitz 1952 DOT(designated order turnaround) ESP(exchange stock portfolio) ( ) 1987 10 19, side car ETFExchange Traded Fund ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF ETF (Creation or Prescribed
More informationelections. In addition, the positive CARs exist during the full event date that indicates the election bull run do happen in Taiwan. When incumbent go
A Study on the Relationship between of Election and Taiwan s Stock Market 992 9 2004 9 GARCH GARCH Ching-Jun, Hsu Wen-Yan Yu, Institute of Financial Management, Nan Hua University ABSTRACT This study examines
More information! Ν! Ν Ν & ] # Α. 7 Α ) Σ ),, Σ 87 ) Ψ ) +Ε 1)Ε Τ 7 4, <) < Ε : ), > 8 7
!! # & ( ) +,. )/ 0 1, 2 ) 3, 4 5. 6 7 87 + 5 1!! # : ;< = > < < ;?? Α Β Χ Β ;< Α? 6 Δ : Ε6 Χ < Χ Α < Α Α Χ? Φ > Α ;Γ ;Η Α ;?? Φ Ι 6 Ε Β ΕΒ Γ Γ > < ϑ ( = : ;Α < : Χ Κ Χ Γ? Ε Ι Χ Α Ε? Α Χ Α ; Γ ;
More information! # %& ( %! & & + %!, ( Α Α Α Α Χ Χ Α Χ Α Α Χ Α Α Α Α
Ε! # % & ( )%! & & + %!, (./ 0 1 & & 2. 3 &. 4/. %! / (! %2 % ( 5 4 5 ) 2! 6 2! 2 2. / & 7 2! % &. 3.! & (. 2 & & / 8 2. ( % 2 & 2.! 9. %./ 5 : ; 5. % & %2 2 & % 2!! /. . %! & % &? & 5 6!% 2.
More informationΠ Ρ! #! % & #! (! )! + %!!. / 0% # 0 2 3 3 4 7 8 9 Δ5?? 5 9? Κ :5 5 7 < 7 Δ 7 9 :5? / + 0 5 6 6 7 : ; 7 < = >? : Α8 5 > :9 Β 5 Χ : = 8 + ΑΔ? 9 Β Ε 9 = 9? : ; : Α 5 9 7 3 5 > 5 Δ > Β Χ < :? 3 9? 5 Χ 9 Β
More informationuntitled
arctan lim ln +. 6 ( + ). arctan arctan + ln 6 lim lim lim y y ( ln ) lim 6 6 ( + ) y + y dy. d y yd + dy ln d + dy y ln d d dy, dy ln d, y + y y dy dy ln y+ + d d y y ln ( + ) + dy d dy ln d dy + d 7.
More informationⅠⅡⅢ Ⅳ
ⅠⅡⅢ Ⅳ ! "!"#$%&!!! !"#$%& ()*+,!"" *! " !! " #$%& ( Δ !"#$%& ()*+,!"" * !! " #$%& ( !"#$%& ()*+,!"" * !! " #$%& ( !"#$%& ()*+,!"" * !! " #$%& (! # !"#$%& ()*+,!"" * !! " #$%& ( 1 1 !"#$%& ()*+,!"" *
More informationuntitled
A Market Test of the Fund s Investment Behavior: Empirical Study Based on the Biggest Institutional Investor of China Stock Market Yi Yao& Zhiyuan Liu (Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071
More information!!! #! )! ( %!! #!%! % + % & & ( )) % & & #! & )! ( %! ),,, )
! # % & # % ( ) & + + !!! #! )! ( %!! #!%! % + % & & ( )) % & & #! & )! ( %! ),,, ) 6 # / 0 1 + ) ( + 3 0 ( 1 1( ) ) ( 0 ) 4 ( ) 1 1 0 ( ( ) 1 / ) ( 1 ( 0 ) ) + ( ( 0 ) 0 0 ( / / ) ( ( ) ( 5 ( 0 + 0 +
More informationΒ 8 Α ) ; %! #?! > 8 8 Χ Δ Ε ΦΦ Ε Γ Δ Ε Η Η Ι Ε ϑ 8 9 :! 9 9 & ϑ Κ & ϑ Λ &! &!! 4!! Μ Α!! ϑ Β & Ν Λ Κ Λ Ο Λ 8! % & Π Θ Φ & Ρ Θ & Θ & Σ ΠΕ # & Θ Θ Σ Ε
! #!! % & ( ) +,. /. 0,(,, 2 4! 6! #!!! 8! &! % # & # &! 9 8 9 # : : : : :!! 9 8 9 # #! %! ; &! % + & + & < = 8 > 9 #!!? Α!#!9 Α 8 8!!! 8!%! 8! 8 Β 8 Α ) ; %! #?! > 8 8 Χ Δ Ε ΦΦ Ε Γ Δ Ε Η Η Ι Ε ϑ 8 9 :!
More information8 9 8 Δ 9 = 1 Η Ι4 ϑ< Κ Λ 3ϑ 3 >1Ε Μ Ε 8 > = 8 9 =
!! % & ( & ),,., / 0 1. 0 0 3 4 0 5 3 6!! 7 8 9 8!! : ; < = > :? Α 4 8 9 < Β Β : Δ Ε Δ Α = 819 = Γ 8 9 8 Δ 9 = 1 Η Ι4 ϑ< Κ Λ 3ϑ 3 >1Ε 8 9 0 Μ Ε 8 > 9 8 9 = 8 9 = 819 8 9 =
More information# # 4 + % ( ) ( /! 3 (0 0 (012 0 # (,!./ %
#! # # %! # + 5 + # 4 + % ( ) ( /! 3 (0 0 (012 0 # (,!./ % ,9 989 + 8 9 % % % % # +6 # % 7, # (% ) ,,? % (, 8> % %9 % > %9 8 % = ΑΒ8 8 ) + 8 8 >. 4. ) % 8 # % =)= )
More information按揭贷款、资产回报与房地产价格
2002 : 1997 1997 4 1997 4 100 2004 4 1997 4 24.0% 28.7% 2004 4 10.3% 11.1%2005 1 12.5% 5.8 13.5% 7 2005 1 35 8 10% 19.9% 16.5%14.7%13.7%12.4%11.9%11.4% 11.2%2001 1 1 95 100 105 110 115 1998-03 1998-09
More information786
Muual Funds Performance Persisence and Classificaion Schemes β Ching-Jun Hsu, Chih-Chien Chiang, Deparmen of Financial Managemen, Nan-Hua Universiy ABSTRACT Muual funds performance persisence is a very
More information8 9 < ; ; = < ; : < ;! 8 9 % ; ϑ 8 9 <; < 8 9 <! 89! Ε Χ ϑ! ϑ! ϑ < ϑ 8 9 : ϑ ϑ 89 9 ϑ ϑ! ϑ! < ϑ < = 8 9 Χ ϑ!! <! 8 9 ΧΧ ϑ! < < < < = 8 9 <! = 8 9 <! <
! # % ( ) ( +, +. ( / 0 1) ( 2 1 1 + ( 3 4 5 6 7! 89 : ; 8 < ; ; = 9 ; ; 8 < = 9! ; >? 8 = 9 < : ; 8 < ; ; = 9 8 9 = : : ; = 8 9 = < 8 < 9 Α 8 9 =; %Β Β ; ; Χ ; < ; = :; Δ Ε Γ Δ Γ Ι 8 9 < ; ; = < ; :
More information,, :, ;,,?, : (1), ; (2),,,, ; (3),,, :,;; ;,,,,(Markowitz,1952) 1959 (,,2000),,, 20 60, ( Evans and Archer,1968) ,,,
: : : 3 :2004 6 30 39 67,, 2005 1 1 2006 12 31,,, ( Evans and Archer) (Latane and Young) (Markowitz) :,,, :?,?,,,, 2006 12 31, 321, 8564161,53 1623150, 18196 % ; 268 6941110, 81104 %, 50 %,,2006,,,2006,
More information) & ( +,! (# ) +. + / & 6!!!.! (!,! (! & 7 6!. 8 / ! (! & 0 6! (9 & 2 7 6!! 3 : ; 5 7 6! ) % (. ()
! # % & & &! # % &! ( &! # )! ) & ( +,! (# ) +. + / 0 1 2 3 4 4 5 & 6!!!.! (!,! (! & 7 6!. 8 / 6 7 6 8! (! & 0 6! (9 & 2 7 6!! 3 : ; 5 7 6! ) % (. () , 4 / 7!# + 6 7 1 1 1 0 7!.. 6 1 1 2 1 3
More information) Μ <Κ 1 > < # % & ( ) % > Χ < > Δ Χ < > < > / 7 ϑ Ν < Δ 7 ϑ Ν > < 8 ) %2 ): > < Ο Ε 4 Π : 2 Θ >? / Γ Ι) = =? Γ Α Ι Ρ ;2 < 7 Σ6 )> Ι= Η < Λ 2 % & 1 &
! # % & ( ) % + ),. / & 0 1 + 2. 3 ) +.! 4 5 2 2 & 5 0 67 1) 8 9 6.! :. ;. + 9 < = = = = / >? Α ) /= Β Χ Β Δ Ε Β Ε / Χ ΦΓ Χ Η Ι = = = / = = = Β < ( # % & ( ) % + ),. > (? Φ?? Γ? ) Μ
More information: 29 : n ( ),,. T, T +,. y ij i =, 2,, n, j =, 2,, T, y ij y ij = β + jβ 2 + α i + ɛ ij i =, 2,, n, j =, 2,, T, (.) β, β 2,. jβ 2,. β, β 2, α i i, ɛ i
2009 6 Chinese Journal of Applied Probability and Statistics Vol.25 No.3 Jun. 2009 (,, 20024;,, 54004).,,., P,. :,,. : O22... (Credibility Theory) 20 20, 80. ( []).,.,,,.,,,,.,. Buhlmann Buhlmann-Straub
More information& &((. ) ( & ) 6 0 &6,: & ) ; ; < 7 ; = = ;# > <# > 7 # 0 7#? Α <7 7 < = ; <
! # %& ( )! & +, &. / 0 # # 1 1 2 # 3 4!. &5 (& ) 6 0 0 2! +! +( &) 6 0 7 & 6 8. 9 6 &((. ) 6 4. 6 + ( & ) 6 0 &6,: & )6 0 3 7 ; ; < 7 ; = = ;# > 7 # 0 7#? Α
More informationWind.NET基金分析算法说明
Wind.NET Shanghai Wind Information Co., Ltd. : 33 9 Zip: 20020 Tel: (862) 6888 2280 Fax: (862) 6888 228 Email: sales@wind.com.cn http://www.wind.com.cn ... 2...2 3...5...5...6...7...8...9... 4... 2...2...3...4...5...6...7...8...9
More information> # ) Β Χ Χ 7 Δ Ε Φ Γ 5 Η Γ + Ι + ϑ Κ 7 # + 7 Φ 0 Ε Φ # Ε + Φ, Κ + ( Λ # Γ Κ Γ # Κ Μ 0 Ν Ο Κ Ι Π, Ι Π Θ Κ Ι Π ; 4 # Ι Π Η Κ Ι Π. Ο Κ Ι ;. Ο Κ Ι Π 2 Η
1 )/ 2 & +! # % & ( ) +, + # # %. /& 0 4 # 5 6 7 8 9 6 : : : ; ; < = > < # ) Β Χ Χ 7 Δ Ε Φ Γ 5 Η Γ + Ι + ϑ Κ 7 # + 7 Φ 0 Ε Φ # Ε + Φ, Κ + ( Λ # Γ Κ Γ #
More information! # %! #! #! # % + &, % % ) %. /! # 0 1
! # %! #! #! # % + &, % % ) %. /! # 0 1 2 32 % 4! #! # 4 4 2 32 4 4! # 2 32 ! # % 2 5 2 32 % % 6 2 7 8 %! 6 # %3 3 9 % /, 9 % 2 % % 3 #7 9 % 2 8 7 2 % 3 7 7 7 8 7 7 7 7 3 9 8 8 % 3! # 7 12 1191 1 ; % %
More information,!! #! > 1? = 4!! > = 5 4? 2 Α Α!.= = 54? Β. : 2>7 2 1 Χ! # % % ( ) +,. /0, , ) 7. 2
! # %!% # ( % ) + %, ). ) % %(/ / %/!! # %!! 0 1 234 5 6 2 7 8 )9!2: 5; 1? = 4!! > = 5 4? 2 Α 7 72 1 Α!.= = 54?2 72 1 Β. : 2>7 2 1 Χ! # % % ( ) +,.
More informationuntitled
4 y l y y y l,, (, ) ' ( ) ' ( ) y, y f ) ( () f f ( ) (l ) t l t lt l f ( t) f ( ) t l f ( ) d (l ) C f ( ) C, f ( ) (l ) L y dy yd π y L y cosθ, π θ : siθ, π yd dy L [ cosθ cosθ siθ siθ ] dθ π π π si
More information= Υ Ξ & 9 = ) %. Ο) Δ Υ Ψ &Ο. 05 3; Ι Ι + 4) &Υ ϑ% Ο ) Χ Υ &! 7) &Ξ) Ζ) 9 [ )!! Τ 9 = Δ Υ Δ Υ Ψ (
! # %! & (!! ) +, %. ( +/ 0 1 2 3. 4 5 6 78 9 9 +, : % % : < = % ;. % > &? 9! ) Α Β% Χ %/ 3. Δ 8 ( %.. + 2 ( Φ, % Γ Η. 6 Γ Φ, Ι Χ % / Γ 3 ϑκ 2 5 6 Χ8 9 9 Λ % 2 Χ & % ;. % 9 9 Μ3 Ν 1 Μ 3 Φ Λ 3 Φ ) Χ. 0
More information基金绩效与股票质地的互动分析
CAPM CAPM T-M H-M Randolph Cohen Joshua Coval Lubos Pastor 2002 1 2 57 40 70% 3 4 q 2004 2003 2 1. 2004 122 CAPM - Fama-French Carhart Sharpe CAPM Without Benchmark MeasureT-M H-M 3 2. 4 2002 Randolph
More information. /!Ι Γ 3 ϑκ, / Ι Ι Ι Λ, Λ +Ι Λ +Ι
! # % & ( ) +,& ( + &. / 0 + 1 0 + 1,0 + 2 3., 0 4 2 /.,+ 5 6 / 78. 9: ; < = : > ; 9? : > Α
More informationuntitled
RESEARCH REPORT 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 Selection Criteria Effect Hypothesis 4 5 3 180 180 2002-12-18 2003-01-02 10 18 18 2003-06-13 2003-07-01 12 18 18 2003-12-16 2004-01-02 12 18 18 2004-06-15 2004-07-01 12
More informationMyers Majluf 1984 Lu Putnam R&D R&D R&D R&D
2018 1 156 1 2 2 1. 233030 2. 233030 2005 ~ 2015 A F830. 2 A 1008-2506 2018 01-0015-12 1 2015 1 2017-07-18 71540004 BBSLDQDKT2017B02 1990-1993 - 1964-1 15 2018 1 2025 2015 1 2011 2 + Myers Majluf 1984
More information: ; # 7 ( 8 7
(! # % & ( ) +,. / +. 0 0 ) 1. 2 3 +4 1/,5,6 )/ ) 7 7 8 9 : ; 7 8 7 # 7 ( 8 7 ; ;! #! % & % ( # ) % + # # #, # % + &! #!. #! # # / 0 ( / / 0! #,. # 0(! #,. # 0!. # 0 0 7 7 < = # ; & % ) (, ) ) ) ) ) )!
More information2 2 Λ ϑ Δ Χ Δ Ι> 5 Λ Λ Χ Δ 5 Β. Δ Ι > Ε!!Χ ϑ : Χ Ε ϑ! ϑ Β Β Β ϑ Χ Β! Β Χ 5 ϑ Λ ϑ % < Μ / 4 Ν < 7 :. /. Ο 9 4 < / = Π 7 4 Η 7 4 =
! # % # & ( ) % # ( +, & % # ) % # (. / ). 1 2 3 4! 5 6 4. 7 8 9 4 : 2 ; 4 < = = 2 >9 3? & 5 5 Α Α 1 Β ΧΔ Ε Α Φ 7 Γ 9Η 8 Δ Ι > Δ / ϑ Κ Α Χ Ε ϑ Λ ϑ 2 2 Λ ϑ Δ Χ Δ Ι> 5 Λ Λ Χ Δ 5 Β. Δ Ι > Ε!!Χ ϑ : Χ Ε ϑ!
More information08-01.indd
1 02 04 08 14 20 27 31 35 40 43 51 57 60 07 26 30 39 50 56 65 65 67 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ω ρ ε 23 λ ω < 1 ω < 1 ω > 0 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ρ 1 ρ σ b a x x i +3 x i
More information- 2 -
* *, - 1 - - 2 - / (1) (2) (3) (4) - 3 - 1 5 2 8 2.1. 8 2.2. 11 2.3. 12 3 14 4 19 5 30 6 35 6.1. 35 6.2. 35 37 39-4 - 1., 2003 adverse selection, (agent problem) (moral hazard) 2001 4 26 2002 2003 1-8
More information4 # = # 4 Γ = 4 0 = 4 = 4 = Η, 6 3 Ι ; 9 Β Δ : 8 9 Χ Χ ϑ 6 Κ Δ ) Χ 8 Λ 6 ;3 Ι 6 Χ Δ : Χ 9 Χ Χ ϑ 6 Κ
! # % & & ( ) +, %. % / 0 / 2 3! # 4 ) 567 68 5 9 9 : ; > >? 3 6 7 : 9 9 7 4! Α = 42 6Β 3 Χ = 42 3 6 3 3 = 42 : 0 3 3 = 42 Δ 3 Β : 0 3 Χ 3 = 42 Χ Β Χ 6 9 = 4 =, ( 9 6 9 75 3 6 7 +. / 9
More information, & % # & # # & % & + # & # # # & # % #,
! # #! % # & # & & ( ( # ) % , & % # & # # & % & + # & # # # & # % #, # % % # % # ) % # % % # % # # % # % # + # % ( ( # % & & & & & & % & & # % # % & & % % % . % # / & & # 0 ) & # % & % ( # # & & & # #
More informationinvesigae he lag relaionship linkage beween he sock marke of U.S. and he sock of Japan and he sock of Taiwan.According o he empirical resuls analysis,
Discussing he linkage beween he sock marke of U.S. and he sock of Japan and he sock of Taiwan Ching-jun Hsu, Associae Professor, Deparmen of Financial Managemen, Nan-Hua Universiy Ming-Heng Wu, Posgraduae
More information% & ( ) +, (
#! % & ( ) +, ( ) (! ( &!! ( % # 8 6 7 6 5 01234% 0 / /. # ! 6 5 6 ;:< : # 9 0 0 = / / 6 >2 % % 6 ; # ( ##+, + # 5 5%? 0 0 = 0 0 Α 0 Β 65 6 66! % 5 50% 5 5 ΗΙ 5 6 Φ Γ Ε) 5 % Χ Δ 5 55 5% ϑ 0 0 0 Κ,,Λ 5!Α
More information1 a benevolen governmen Baaglini Coae 005 Golosov 007 Berola 1993 Peroi 1993 Alesina Rodrik 1994 a self - ineresed governmen Besley Case 1995 Acemoglu
1 3 U U 4 510006 dengkebin@ mail. gdufs. edu. cn 361005 wym@ xmu. edu. cn 71003030 7107303 09&ZD01 10CJ010 09YJC79005 09E03 JA11010S 10Y05 1 3 1 a benevolen governmen Baaglini Coae 005 Golosov 007 Berola
More information02302.doc
1 1 Madhavan000 Glen(1994) (Levine1991) 3 4 1998 1999 1999 000 (Price and Time Prioriy) 5 6 ( ) 1 3 7 Kyle1985 4 :1 Breadh Widh (Deph) (Order Book) 3 Resiliency 4 (Immediacy) Harris(1990) (Immediacy) marke
More information表 1:股指收益的基本统计结果
CFEF RR/4/6 6 * Scaled- VaR Scaled- Scaled- Scaled- Scaled- VaR Kendall(1953) Osborne(1959) 1 1994 VAR Rsk Mercs, Alexander 1961 Osborne * MADIS Peers 1991 198 1989 S&P5 Peers 1991, Smh 1981 Gray French
More information上证联合研究计划第三期课题报告
3 5% 998 A B 3 3. 3. 3.3 3.3. 3.3. 3.3.3 3.3.4 3.3.5 4 5 5. 5. 5.3 6 A A IPO 7 998 647 63.74% 96.5% 99 A 99 5 967.98 637.85 56.9 - A 993 4.36%5.7%.48%6.53% 997 4% 997 %6% - 99-3 99 65% 5% 995 998 999 -
More information<4D6963726F736F667420576F7264202D20323031342DB5DA32C6DA2DD6D0B4F3B9DCC0EDD1D0BEBF2DC4DACEC42D6F6B2DD2BBD0A32E646F63>
中 大 管 理 研 究 2014 年 第 9 卷 (2) 投 资 者 情 绪 与 会 计 信 息 价 值 相 关 性 基 于 中 国 上 市 公 司 的 实 证 分 析 1 季 美 惠 宋 顺 林 王 思 琪 摘 要 : 目 前, 国 内 有 关 投 资 者 情 绪 的 研 究 主 要 集 中 于 投 资 者 情 绪 与 股 票 回 报 之 间 关 系 的 研 究, 有 关 投 资 者 情 绪 对
More informationA 1 2 1 2 1.1 2 1.2 6 1.3 7 2 9 2.1 9 2.2 10 3 11 3.1 12 3.2 13 3.3 15 4 20 4.1 21 4.2 22 22 2 Merrill Lynch Bernstein 18 sell-side indicator 18 60 sell-side indicator 1 1.1 1952 (H.Markowitz) 3 (Economics
More informationΨ! Θ! Χ Σ! Υ Χ Ω Σ Ξ Ψ Χ Ξ Ζ Κ < < Κ Ζ [Ψ Σ Ξ [ Σ Ξ Χ!! Σ > _ Κ 5 6!< < < 6!< < α Χ Σ β,! Χ! Σ ; _!! Χ! Χ Ζ Σ < Ω <!! ; _!! Χ Υ! Σ!!!! ββ /β χ <
! # %!! ( (! +,. /0 0 1 2,34 + 5 6 7,3. 7, 8, 2 7 + 1 9 #. 3 : + ; + 5 83 8 % 8 2 ; , 1 1 8 2 =? : + 2 = 2 = Α 1,!. Β 3 + 5 Χ Β Β
More informationuntitled
2000 1 1975 Quote-driven SystemOrder-driven System 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 1999 2 3 r it rit = ln pit ln pi, t 1 p p it i, t 1 1 2 Kyle1985 4 4 1BreadthWidth 2 (Depth) (Order Book)3Resiliency 4(Immediacy)
More informationby market behavioral biases. In addition, behavioral biases should also be considered when discussing high-tech venturing process, especially fund-rai
The implications of Behavioral Finance on Corporate Finance Muh-Guei Shiau Associate Professor Department of Business Administration China Institute of Technology There are two ways to re-discuss the issues
More information富国动态平衡证券投资基金2003年年度报告
2003 2004 3 25 689 13 14 200001 021-53594678 021-63410600 23 100 7 8 100036 010 68424199 010 68424181 146 146 1 2003 2002 1 0.0083 ( )-0.0104 ( )-0.0115 2 34,130,534.74-301,005,485.23 3 0.0222-0.0772 4
More information1 3 5657 1960 91 106 Karl HassertDie St(dte Geographisch BetrachtetLeipzig. R.BlanchardGrenobleétudedeGeographieUrbainePrais1911. TaglorT.G.Urban Geography1946New YorkE.P.Dutton. 2 1 48 46 ä 111 486
More information11第十一章階層線性模式.DOC
11.1 11.1.1 (student-level) (personal-level) ( ) (school-level) (organization-level) ( ) 1. (disaggregation) (estimated standard errors) (type one error). (aggregation) (within-group) (1997) (hierarchical
More information< < ; : % & < % & > & % &? > & 5 % & ( ; & & % & Α Β + 8 ; Α9 Χ Δ () Χ Δ Ε 41 Φ # (Β % Γ : 9 Χ Δ Η +9 Χ Δ 2 9 Χ Δ 2 0 /? % & Ι 1 ϑ Κ 3 % & % & + 9 Β 9
!! #! % & ( ) +,. / 0 1 2 34 5 6 % & +7 % & 89 % & % & 79 % & : % & < < ; : % & < % & > & % &? > & 5 % & ( ; & & % & Α Β + 8 ; Α9 Χ Δ () Χ Δ Ε 41 Φ # (Β % Γ : 9 Χ Δ Η +9 Χ Δ 2 9 Χ Δ 2 0 /? % & Ι 1 ϑ Κ
More informationuntitled
00, + lim l[ ] =. ( + lim[ ] = lim[ ] ( + i e ( = ( + lim l[ ] = l e = ( 4 (, (, (, 0 d f d D= D + D, d f d + d f d =. 0 D = (, 0,, 4 D = (,, 4 D ( D =, 0,. 4 0 0 4 ( + ( = ( d f, d d f, d d f, d. - =
More information! + +, ) % %.!&!, /! 0! 0 # ( ( # (,, # ( % 1 2 ) (, ( 4! 0 & 2 /, # # ( &
! # %! &! #!! %! %! & %! &! & ( %! & #! & )! & & + ) +!!, + ! + +, ) % %.!&!, /! 0! 0 # ( ( # (,, # ( % 1 2 ) (, 3 0 1 ( 4! 0 & 2 /, # # ( 1 5 2 1 & % # # ( #! 0 ) + 4 +, 0 #,!, + 0 2 ), +! 0! 4, +! (!
More informationuntitled
Granger Granger Granger M1 ECM M1 M1 20 90 1 2005 2004 10 12 7 2004 11 10 2004 11 17 Vasicek(1977) Dothan (1978) Courtadon (1982) Cox Ingersoll and Ross (1985) Chan Karolyi Longstaff and Sanders (1992)
More information8 8 Β Β : ; Χ; ; ; 8 : && Δ Ε 3 4Φ 3 4Φ Ε Δ Ε > Β & Γ 3 Γ 3 Ε3Δ 3 3 3? Ε Δ Δ Δ Δ > Δ # Χ 3 Η Ι Ι ϑ 3 Γ 6! # # % % # ( % ( ) + ( # ( %, & ( #,.
! # % & ( ) ( +,.% /.0.% 1 2 3 4 5 6 #! 7 8 9 9 : ; 8 : ; &; ; < ; 7 => 9 9 8?; 8! 3 3 3 3 Β & Γ 3 Γ 3 Ε3Δ 3 3 3?
More informationebookg 38-28
8 8 17 19 16 8 73 8.1 1 [ 1 ] 1 3 M y y= E(r M) r f 0.01 A M ( 8-1 ) E(r M ) r f M M A M E(r M ) E(r M ) M [1] Sanford J.Grossman and Joseph E.Stiglitz, On the Impossibility of Informationally E fficient
More information%% &% %% %% %% % () (! #! %!!!!!!!%! # %& ( % & ) +, # (.. /,) %& 0
!! # # %% &% %% %% %% % () (! #! %!!!!!!!%! # %& ( % & ) +, # (.. /,) %& 0 +! (%& / 1! 2 %& % & 0/ / %& + (.%.%, %& % %& )& % %& ) 3, &, 5, % &. ) 4 4 4 %& / , %& ).. % # 6 /0 % &. & %& ) % %& 0.!!! %&
More informationⅠ Ⅱ 1 2 Ⅲ Ⅳ
Ⅰ Ⅱ 1 2 Ⅲ Ⅳ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
More informationMicrosoft Word - p11.doc
() 11-1 ()Classification Analysis( ) m() p.d.f prior (decision) (loss function) Bayes Risk for any decision d( ) posterior risk posterior risk Posterior prob. j (uniform prior) where Mahalanobis Distance(M-distance)
More information35 007 373 9 092 44.472 1 175 248 731 773 1 907 021 10 162 706 19 1808 1847 3 1830 325 X (1) (2) (3) 406 453 8. Y X 2. 3. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10....... 11.
More information/ / Critical Mass of Web Servers * Network economics Network externalities positive feedback effect Critical Mass WWW
/ 45-57 *rialin7@yahoo.com.w Criical Mass of Web Servers * Nework economics Nework exernaliies posiive feedback effec Criical Mass WWW WWW es WWW es Nework exernaliies Kaz and Shapiro 1985 Rohlfs 1974
More information《分析化学辞典》_数据处理条目_1.DOC
3 4 5 6 7 χ χ m.303 B = f log f log C = m f = = m = f m C = + 3( m ) f = f f = m = f f = n n m B χ α χ α,( m ) H µ σ H 0 µ = µ H σ = 0 σ H µ µ H σ σ α H0 H α 0 H0 H0 H H 0 H 0 8 = σ σ σ = ( n ) σ n σ /
More information中国金融体系运行效率分析(提纲)
20 90 6 1...1 1.1...1 1.1.1...1 1.1.2...3 1.2...6 1.2.1...6 1.2.2...7 2...8 2.1...9 2.1.1...9 2.1.2...11 2.2...13 2.2.1...13 2.2.2...15 2.3...17 2.3.1...17 2.3.2...20 3...21 3.1...22 3.1.1...22 3.1.2...25
More information