(paparazzo) Von Hannover v. Germany See DH-MM (2000) 007: Conference on Freedom of Expression and the Right to Privacy (Str

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "1997 8 (paparazzo) 1 8 10 2 2004 Von Hannover v. Germany 3 4 1 See DH-MM (2000) 007: Conference on Freedom of Expression and the Right to Privacy (Str"

夏倪
7 years ago
Views:

1 (celebrities) (public figures) (public officials)

2 (paparazzo) Von Hannover v. Germany See DH-MM (2000) 007: Conference on Freedom of Expression and the Right to Privacy (Strasbourg, 23 September 1999). 2 See Resolution 1165 on the Right to Privacy, Eur. Parl. Ass., 29 th Sess. (1998). 3 Von Hannover v. Germany, Application no /00, decided on 24 June 2004; final on 24 September (HUDOC database) < (last visited on 12 July 2011) 4 Von Hannover v. Germany, at para

September 1999). 2 See Resolution 1165 on the Right to Privacy, Eur. Parl. Ass., 29 th Sess. (1998). 3 Von Hannover v.

3 (House of Lords) 5 Von Hannover Naomi Campbell Campbell v. MGN Ltd (The Constitutional Reform Act 2005) [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 A.C. 457 (H.L.) (Eng.). 7 see Barbara McDonald, Privacy, Princesses, and Paparazzi, 50 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. 205 ( ). 3

4 (okios) (agora) Samuel D. Warren Louis D. Brandeis (the right to be let alone) Griswold v. Connecticut Samuel D. Warren & Louis D. Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, 4 HARV. L. REV. 193, 193 (1890) U.S. 479 (1965) See AMITAI ETZIONI, THE LIMITS OF PRIVACY (1999) Bowers v. Hardwick,478 U.S. 186 (1986) 2003 Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) Bowers

5 (Aristotle Onassis) (Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis) Ron Galella Galella v. Onassis, 353 F. Supp. 196 (S.D.N.Y. 1972), aff d in part, rev d in part, 487 F.2d. 986 (2 nd Cir. 1973) Id. at See Kendall Thomas, Beyond the Privacy Principle, 92 COLUM. L. REV. 1431,

1972), aff d in part, rev d in part, 487 F.2d. 986 (2 nd Cir. 1973) Id.

6 (zonal paradigm) (relational paradigm) (decisional paradigm) 8 (inner circle) 13 Von Hannover 14 Katz v. United States 15 (1992). 13 See Marc P. Misthal, Reigning in the Paparazzi: The Human Rights Act, The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the Rights of Privacy and Publicity in England, 10 INT L LEGAL PERSP. 287, (1998). 14 Von Hannover v. Germany, at para Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967) (majority opinion). 6

Misthal, Reigning in the Paparazzi: The Human Rights Act, The European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental

7 16 16 Katz John Marshall Harlan II Katz, 389 U.S. at (Harlan, J., concurring). 7

8 See Resolution 1165 on the Right to Privacy, supra note 3, at para Von Hannover v. Germany, at para

9 see Jamie E. Nordhaus, Celebrities Rights to Privacy: How Far Should the Paparazzi Be Allowed to Go?, 18(2) REV. LITIG. 285, (1999). 23 See Nordhaus, supra note 22, at

10 25 (ad hoc, case by case balancing) (definitional balancing) 25 See Patrick J. Alach, Paparazzi and Privacy, 28 LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV. 205, 221 (2008). 10

11 22 26 (newsworthiness) (social value) (public notoriety) Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U. S. (2011) 8 1 John Glover Roberts, Jr. Available at < (last visited 14 July 2011). 27 See Nordhaus, supra note 22, at

Available at <http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-751.

12 28 28 See McDonald, supra note 7, at

13 (content) (form) (context) See e.g. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749 (1985)

14 31 (George Eastman) (film) (image) (photography) (Susan Sontag) SUSAN SONTAG, ON PHOTOGRAPHY 8 (1990). 14

15 (aesthetic consumerism) Id. at Id. at Id. 36 Id. at Id. at

16 Id. at Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U. S. (2011) (Alito, J., dissenting). 16

Microsoft Word - 01憲法位階的環境權.doc

Microsoft Word - 01憲法位階的環境權.doc 第一篇憲法位階的環境權從擁有環境到參與環境決策摘要隨著環境課題的崛起, 環境權的字眼頻頻出現, 民間要求將環境權列入憲法, 學界亦為文從不同角度闡揚環境權環境權受到如此重視, 固然是國內環保意識抬頭的表徵 ; 然而, 論