,2018,38(11): 犃犮狋犪犅狅狋. 犅狅狉犲犪犾. 犗犮犮犻犱犲狀狋. 犛犻狀. : (2018) 犱狅犻 : /j.issn "#$%& 犆犻犘犝犅 22 ' (,,,,,,!

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download ",2018,38(11): 犃犮狋犪犅狅狋. 犅狅狉犲犪犾. 犗犮犮犻犱犲狀狋. 犛犻狀. : (2018) 犱狅犻 : /j.issn "#$%& 犆犻犘犝犅 22 ' (,,,,,,!"

研裙终
5 years ago
Views:

$/BC DE, 010018) ) *: FGH( 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 )IJ IK ILM,NOJ ),PQRSC 9 :TU,VW XY TU TU? ' FGHOJ Z[\$] ^_1` 犆犻犘犝犅 22 (plant U box22)tu cdna abc, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU 1260bp, 419 T PCR,' L ABA ;1h 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU _,.$

1 ,2018,38(11): 犃犮狋犪犅狅狋. 犅狅狉犲犪犾. 犗犮犮犻犱犲狀狋. 犛犻狀. : (2018) 犱狅犻 : /j.issn "#$%& 犆犻犘犝犅 22 ' (,,,,,,! ( , 9: ;-./, 9 < = A -./BC DE, ) ) *: FGH( 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 )IJ IK ILM,NOJ ),PQRSC 9 :TU,VW XY TU TU? ' FGHOJ Z[\$] ^_1` 犆犻犘犝犅 22 (plant U box22)tu cdna abc, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU 1260bp, 419 T PCR,' L ABA ;1h 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU _,. X ,OJ ; 12d _,X 2.5, 犆犻犘犝犅 22 Z[ 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU Z,, ZTU 9.,'150mmol/LNaCl 1μmol/LABA 400mmol/L ;,, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU ' / L I +,-:E3 ; FGH; 犆犻犘犝犅 22; / ; ". /:Q786;Q :A 犆犾狅狀犻狀犵犪狀犱犉狌狀犮狋犻狅狀犪犾犆犺犪狉犪犮狋犲狉犻狕犪狋犻狅狀狅犳犆犻犘犝犅 22 犳狉狅犿犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 YUE Wenran,YU Xiumin,YUEJunyan,YANG Qi, HAN Xiaodong,WANG Ruigang,LIGuojing (ColegeofLifeSciences,InnerMongoliaAgriculturalUniversity,InnerMongoliaKeyLaboratoryofPlantStressPhysiologyand MolecularBiology,Inner MongoliaScientificInnovation Team ofgeneticresource Utilizationand MolecularImprovementof StressResistantPlants,Hohhot010018,China) 犃犫狊狋狉犪犮狋 : 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 isanimportantsand fixingshrubinnorthwestaridareawithdrought,cold andsaline alkaliresistance.excelentstressresistantcandidategenesscreenedfromitcouldprovidegood generesourcesforgeneticengineeringofforestandforagespecies.inthisstudy,thefullengthcdnase quenceof 犆犻犘犝犅 22(plantU box22)hadbeenminedfromthetranscriptomelibraryconstructedinourla boratoryusingdroughtstressedseedlingsof 犆. 犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪.The 犆犻犘犝犅 22genecontained1260bpopen readingframe(orf)whichencoding419aminoacids.quantitativerealtimepcranalysisshowedthat theexpressionlevelsof 犆犻犘犝犅 22weresignificantlyincreasedandreachedthehighestlevel,whichwas12, 35and7timesofthecontrolat1hafterdehydration,NaCland ABAtreatments,respectively.After droughttreatment,therelativeexpressionof 犆犻犘犝犅 22wassignificantlyincreasedandreachedthehighest levelat12d,whichwas2.5timesmorethanthatofthecontrol.theresultsindicatedthatthetranscrip : ; : :!"(KCBJ )!:#$%(1990-),&,',()*+,-./ E mail:yuewenran@126.com 01 :,, 2, 3,()*+,-./ E mail:liguojing@imau.edu.cn

2 tionof 犆犻犘犝犅 22wasinducedbyabioticstress.Furthermore,expressionvectorpCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22wascon structedandtransformedintothe wild type 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊.Homozygoustransgenic 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 overex pressing 犆犻犘犝犅 22 weregeneratedforfurtheranalysis.seedgerminationassayshowedthat 犆犻犘犝犅 22 transgeniclinesgerminatedslowerthanthatofwild typeon mediumcontaining150 mmol/l NaCl,400 mmol/l mannitolor1μmol/l ABA.Theseresultsindicatedthat 犆犻犘犝犅 22decreasedtoleranceofthe transgenic 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 tosaltandosmotictreatmentsduringseedgermination. 犓犲狔狑狅狉犱狊 :E3ubiquitinligase; 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 ; 犆犻犘犝犅 22;seedgermination;osmoticstress /26S (ubiquitinproteasome pathway,upp)n ), Q [1], N ), :,' ATP ',,,;,26S, [2] UPP ( ) (Ub), (E1) (E2) (E3) 26S \,R, E3 ' Q!_() A [3] E3 () N" )#,,$, % & ' (Lys),* Z _ ', E3 T U 1400 [4], 1300 [5] "()*+, E3-. 5 [6] :HECT (homologoustoe6 APC terminus) RING (realyinterestingnew gene)/u box APC (anaphasepromotingcomplex,. / 0 ) SCF (Skpl/CulinorCDC53/F boxprotein)0 CUL3 BTB U box N 1 E3, 1* UFD2(ubiquitinfusiondeg radationprotein2), 70 2 T,N 3 4 b U / [7] U box N B 5 RING,R 2\ 67,0./ A89 :; / "(,' 64 T U U box E3 [8], )* 77 [9] ), U box E3 - b <=>?@A [10] %BC,) D? 犘犝犅 22 R E? T U 犘犝犅 23 2 E? U box E3 PUB22 PUB23- RPN12a VW, RPN12a, C O J < = [11] ( 犆犪狆狊犻犮狌犿犪狀狀狌狌犿 )CaPUB1 (putative U box protein1),- PUB22 PUB23E?. X 51% - 52%,,CaPUB1 - RPN6,0, RPN6 C OJ L <= [12] SeoD H > [13] 犘犝犅 22 犘犝犅 23' O J < = N F G ' ABA,HNR IFJK ChoSK > [14] PUB22 PUB23, RNP6 ZhaoJF> [15], PUB22 PUB23 0, ABA PYL9 (pyrabactinresistance like)l OJ I M N O,PUB22 PUB23 I - PAMP (pathogen associatedmolecularpaterns)1 [16] MPK3 (mitogen activatedproteinki nase3)! <= [17] F G H ( 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 ); PQ FGH; B RS,T IJ I K I U ILM>,NOJ V WX Y SC ;MNO, FGHI A A, N? 5 Z [ [18 19] \ ' F G H O J Z [ \ $ ] ^ _ 1 ` E3 T U a b cdnac, 1]. R; U box E3 A PCR ^ 犆犻犘犝犅 22' O J L ABA > ;. 0, 犆犻犘犝犅 22', Z T U ' / L I _. X ` 犆犻犘犝犅 22 TU' FGH<=9: a Tb 1 Z[ c FGH / /, (1 2), 22 16h /8h U Q1 b NaCl ABA ; *,,. 300mmol/LNaCl 100μmol/LABA

3 11. #$%,>: FGH 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU ;,. ' ; h, 3.,,-80 ; 3 0 OJ ;: b1, 1d X,O, 3d 1,OJ16d 0,0 2d,. X d (16F), c E ( 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊狋犺犪犾犻犪狀犪 )Colum bia 0 (Col 0) \, pcang HA 8<=-,6 DH5a 4 GV3101 \ 犚犖犃 : A Trizol FGH RNA A ( Quawel. Q5000) RNA,A RNA, Q RNA cdna 3, (a :,AT311 03) <56=>?@ ( Z[\ ] TUc,@A Primer5 F 犆犻犘犝犅 22 Q (TCAGAAAAGGTAACAA AAGCGACA) R 犆犻犘犝犅 22 Q (TTCAGCTCT TCCCTCAGCACA) A SYBR GreenⅠ [,@A LightCycler480 PCR (Roche ) = X:10 μl SYBRPremixExTaq(TaKaRa ), 0.4μL(10μmol/L), 5μL,DEPC 4.2μL, 20μL = cx:95 30s,95 5s,60 15s, s,40, A2 -ΔΔCt c A X q 犆犻犈犉 1α F (CAAAAAGTC CCCTCGTTGTCTC) q 犆犻犈犉 1α R (AGCAATC GTTCTTCCTAATGATCTAA );q 犃狋犈犉 1α F (AGAA GGGTGCCAAATGATGAG ) q 犃狋犈犉 1α R (GGA GGGAGAGAGAAAGTCACAGA) '?@ABCD W FGH 1 cdna X, pcang HA, 犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ & F 犆犻犘犝犅 22 (GCGTCGACAT GGATGAGATCGATGTTCCT, X 犛犪犾 Ⅰ ) R 犆犻犘犝犅 22(GCGAGCTCTTTCACA CATAATTAGGGTACGA, X 犛犪犮 Ⅰ ) PCR, ` X:98 3 min,98 15s,57 30s, min,30 "# ($ )"#" %&, ' peasy BluntSimple ( a : ),Z,6 DH5a, R PCR \ /, c, ' pcang HA, R PCR, \ Z,4 GV3101,( ) PCR - c,\ A c * ^+, E 0 /P \ pcang 犆犻犘犝犅 22Z, [20],0 # / ' 25mg/L 1 1/2MS T PQ),P Q _ T 3 RNA, R Z[ cdna,@a PCR ZTU,Q <56= FGHIJK / A75% 2 10 min, A min,4 / 5 O. ' 150 mmol/l NaCl 1μmol/L ABA 400 mmol/l 1/2MS T, 556 /,4 E, ;3d,, 22 16h /8h U,24h 犆犻犘犝犅 22 '> L?@ABCD. 89 FGHOJZ[\$] E3 TU,T.9. UTR c UN, pcang HA 犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ & F 犆犻犘犝犅 22 R 犆犻犘犝犅 22,@ A F G H cdna X, PCR, _" %&(: 1,A) _ c % & ' peasy Blunt Simple, c c A 犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ ' pcang HA, \ pcang 犆犻犘犝犅 22 Z, 6,( ) R,A 犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ (:1,B), %&, \ \ Z, 4 GV3101,( ) PCR, ;:1,C 9

1964 38 2.2 犆犻犘犝犅 22 'MN ( _ 犆犻犘犝犅 22 T U cdna c, 1260bp,!7 / ATG, / TGA, 419 T (:2) T c ' NCBI BlastP, RT U box,- ( 犕犲犱犻犮犪犵狅狋狉狌狀犮犪狋狌犾犪 )PUB23 (XP_013450220.

$9 / :2 犆犻犘犝犅 22TUcDNA c T c.indicatesterminationcodon Fig.2 ThecDNAanddeducedaminoacid sequencesof 犆犻犘犝犅 22 A. 犆犻犘犝犅 22,M.DL10000;1 2. 犆犻犘犝犅 22cDNA;B.pCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22 \ ; 1. \ ;2.$ 犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ ;M.DL5000;C.pCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22 R PCR ;1~4. ;M.DL5000 :1 pcang 犆犻犘犝犅 22 A. 犆犻犘犝犅 22,M.DL10000;1,2. 犆犻犘犝犅 22cDNA.B.IdentificationofpCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22digestedbyrestrictionenzyme. 1.

犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ ;M.DL5000;C.pCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22 R PCR ;1~4. ;M.DL5000 :1 pcang 犆犻犘犝犅 22 A. 犆犻犘犝犅 22,M.DL10000;1,2. 犆犻犘犝犅 22cDNA.B.IdentificationofpCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22digestedbyrestrictionenzyme. 1.

4 犆犻犘犝犅 22 'MN ( _ 犆犻犘犝犅 22 T U cdna c, 1260bp,!7 / ATG, / TGA, 419 T (:2) T c ' NCBI BlastP, RT U box,- ( 犕犲犱犻犮犪犵狅狋狉狌狀犮犪狋狌犾犪 )PUB23 (XP_ ) < ( 犆犻犮犲狉犪狉犻犲狋犻狀狌犿 ) PUB22 (XP_ ) ( 犆犪犼犪狀狌狊犮犪犼犪狀 )PUB22 (XP_ ) PUB22 (NP_ ) PUB23 (OAP )=>. X84% 84% 81% 58% 58%, _ T U ; U box T U,U N R 7? X 犆犻犘犝犅 % =,A (: 3),CiPUB22 - PUB23 < PUB22 B _!,c 89 c =>. X84%,CD? % 2.3 犆犻犘犝犅 22 '?@ PCR 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU'FE ;.,OJ ;12d 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU _, XE ; 2.5,15d (: 4,A) ;1h 犆犻犘犝犅 22 _. 9 / :2 犆犻犘犝犅 22TUcDNA c T c.indicatesterminationcodon Fig.2 ThecDNAanddeducedaminoacid sequencesof 犆犻犘犝犅 22 A. 犆犻犘犝犅 22,M.DL10000;1 2. 犆犻犘犝犅 22cDNA;B.pCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22 \ ; 1. \ ;2. 犛犪犾 Ⅰ 犛犪犮 Ⅰ ;M.DL5000;C.pCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22 R PCR ;1~4. ;M.DL5000 :1 pcang 犆犻犘犝犅 22 A. 犆犻犘犝犅 22,M.DL10000;1,2. 犆犻犘犝犅 22cDNA.B.IdentificationofpCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22digestedbyrestrictionenzyme. 1.Vectorcontrol;2.Digestwith 犛犪犾 Ⅰ and 犛犪犮 Ⅰ;M.DL5000;C.IdentificationofpCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22bycolonyPCR; 1-4.Randomsinglecolony;M.DL5000 Fig.1 TheconstructionofpCanG 犆犻犘犝犅 22recombinantvector :3 CiPUB22-R =?,. Fig.3 PhylogeneticanalysisofCiPUB22andotherrelatedproteins

$1965, _E ; 12 F,3h 7,12h, E ;,24hT \G0_E ; ' NaCl ;, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU'1h XE ; 35 F,3h H I ' ABA ;1h, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU XE ; 7,H3h,T\-E ;,6h E ; (: 4,B) J K 犆犻犘犝犅 22 Z[,L 犆犻犘犝犅 22 V - F G H M./ 2.4 犆犻犘犝犅 22 'O B?$

5 11. #$%,>: FGH 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU , _E ; 12 F,3h 7,12h, E ;,24hT \G0_E ; ' NaCl ;, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU'1h XE ; 35 F,3h H I ' ABA ;1h, 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU XE ; 7,H3h,T\-E ;,6h E ; (: 4,B) J K 犆犻犘犝犅 22 Z[,L 犆犻犘犝犅 22 V - F G H M./ 2.4 犆犻犘犝犅 22 'O B?@ ( \ pcang 犆犻犘犝犅 22Z',P Q, T 1 T 3 ) 8, JK RNA, Z[ cdna,@atu & F 犆犻犘犝犅 22 R 犆犻犘犝犅 22 PCR +,; : 5,A 9,W cdna X N," `Y, FGH 8 ZTU," `Y, 犆犻犘犝犅 22T U ' Z T U,@ A qrt PCR 8 ZTU,;: 5,B 9,Q 3 T 3 6 T 3 19 T 犆犻犘犝犅 22 'E FGHIJK 3 /,. ' mmol/l NaCl 1μmol/L ABA 400mmol/L 1/2MS T, / O '1/2MS T,3 - (: 6,A E),1μmol/L ABA ;4$, X 97%,3. X90% 75% 82%(:6, B F) ' 150mmol/LNaCl T, 5$ X94%,3. X 86% 61% 66% (: 6,C G) '400mmol/L ;,3 (:6,D H) W :&? 犆犻犘犝犅 22 T U / & L ABA I 8 :4 qrt PCR ;` 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU Fig.4 Theexpressionof 犆犻犘犝犅 22underdiferenttreatmentsdetectedbyqRT PCR A. 犆犻犘犝犅 22ZTU RT PCR + :M.DL2000;C -. ( cdna);c +.) ( FGHcDNA); B.qRT PCR + 犆犻犘犝犅 22ZTU :5 犆犻犘犝犅 22ZTU - A.RT PCRidentificationof 犆犻犘犝犅 22transgenic 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 lines:m.dl2000;c -.Negativecontrol( 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 cdna); C +.Positivecontrol( 犆犪狉犪犵犪狀犪犻狀狋犲狉犿犲犱犻犪 cdna);b.qrt PCRanalysisof 犆犻犘犝犅 22expressionin 犆犻犘犝犅 22transgenic 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 lines Fig.5 Identificationandexpressionanalysisof 犆犻犘犝犅 22transgenic 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 lines

6 ! １９６６ " # $ % & ３８ º ＬＡＢＡ１５０ｍｍｏＬＮＣＬ ÔÕÖ±YÇ?È ＡＤ Ç?ÈkÄ ³ÎÏØÒÙ+Ü ＥＨ»¼ １μｍｏ k ４００ｍｍｏ kä ³ÎÏ? yz X7? ( ６ 6}¼ X ６ pi±y ÎÏEÇ?ÈØÒÙåØ ＡＤＳｄｇｍｎｏｎｏｈｗｄｎｃｎＥＨＰｈｎｏｏｈｗｄｙｐｎｄ犆犻犘犝犅２２ｇｎｙｐｙｐｎｄ犆犻犘犝犅２２ＬＮＣＬＡＢＡｎｄ４００ｍｍｏＬｍｎｎｕｍｕｐｐｍｎｄｗｈｏｗｈｏｕ１５０ｍｍｏ１μｍｏｏｎｃｎｏｎ１２ＭＳｍｄｇｎＰｈｏｏｇｐｈｗｋｎ６ｄｙｈｎｄｏｃｏｎＦ６Ｇｍｎｏｎｙｏｈｎｇｎｃｎｎｄｗｄｄｎｍｎｇｙｐｕｎｄ３ ~ ² Ý 犆犻犘犝犅２２ ô E # $ _ W õ & j 犘犝犅２２ p )X Y y t v w RJ${ ªk ] E ` a y t k v Ûb Z ` î #$ ² 1ì ＡＢＡ ±Y Á 2 １２ \ ] Ò Ó 犆犻犘犝犅２２ 9 ＡＢＡ ±Y １ｈ ² ³ª > i ±Y { ７ ½ o Ï?YúaÄ g a» ã ä D Ä x p ３ｈ ² ³ª Þ Ei±Y{ ³ª ì ²?$Ëmõ{ ú Ð Þ û Æ ' è é { Ä? $ ６ｈ ²Û Ü i ± Y { ³ ª Ý 犆犻犘犝犅２２ kà?$ Á 2 ã ä D Ä Ò ù ô : ôn ＡＢＡ Á 2 t ì «E@ & j pì ² s Ｅ３ ãäåæç 9 ú Ð Þ û / è é n Ò Z A J õrüÿì)=> e x» Ｅ３ ãäåæç{=>ab2 ß [ ＡＢＡ 9#$? Ò ^ k ` a W X Ä n Aõ\]< É Ê Ë 犘犝犅２２ k 犘犝犅２３ & Ò Z A J e # à G Ò ^ E % à G Ø ¹ Ò ２１ A õ = > < h N Ｕｂｏｘ È Ｅ３ ã ä å æ À?$ Á 2 r x» ＡＢＡ p ; １２ 9 \ ç]eàgøòä Y ＡＰＵＢ１８ k ＡＰＵＢ１９ x ]n HÄ Ｂ FÑÒÓ ２ i c Ð { è é 犃狋犘犝犅１８ K 犃狋犘犝犅１９ È Ｅ３ ãäå æ ç 犘犝犅２２ ì ic Ｕｂｏｘ È Ｅ３ ã ä å æ ç YÜ ｐｎＵｂｏｘ犆犻犘犝犅２２ ytkvb {pi Û{Á2E&j{«ì $ ² E Ç? È a \» ＡＢＡ k v % { à G Ø Ò x õ $ D r x

7 11. #$%,>: FGH 犆犻犘犝犅 22TU 狆狌犫 18 狆狌犫 19 \ / ^, ABA L F [13] ; 狆狌犫 44 狆狌犫 43 \ /, ABA F [22] > /,' 150 mmol/l NaCl 400 mmol/l ;,, 犆犻犘犝犅 22 _ ` Z T U ' / & L I 8 '\,ABA ;W, 犆犻犘犝犅 22 a Z T U ABA "(IN 犆犻犘犝犅 22T U' /,RT AIb ) 0: [1] c S,,. E3[J].,2005,27(3): YANGD Y,LIU K Y,YU Z H.E3ubiquitinligase[J]. 犆犺犻狀狊犲犑狅狌狀犪犾狅犳犆犲犾犅犻狅犾狅犵狔,2005,27(3): [2] SMALLEJ,VIERSTRA R D.Theubiquitin26Sproteasome proteolyticpathway[j]. 犃狀狀狌犪犾犚犲狏犻犲狑狅犳犘犾犪狀狋犅犻狅犾狅犵狔, 2004,55(1): [3] DESHAIESRJ,JOAZEIROCA.RINGdomainE3ubiquitin ligases[j]. 犃狀狀狌犪犾犚犲狏犻犲狑狅犳犅犻狅犮犺犲犿犻狊狋狉狔,2009,78(1): [4] LEEJH,KIM W T.Regulationofabioticstresssignaltrans ductionbye3ubiquitinligasesin 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 [J]. 犕狅犾犲犮狌犾犲狊犪狀犱犆犲犾狊,2011,31(3): [5] DU Z,ZHOU X,LIL, 犲狋犪犾.Plants UPS:adatabaseof plants ubiquitin proteasome system [J]. 犅犕犆犌犲狀狅犿犻犮狊, 2009,10(1):1 6. [6] MOONJ,PARRY G,ESTELLE M.Theubiquitin protea somepathwayandplantdevelopment[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犆犲犾,2004, 16(12): [7] HATAKEYAMAS,NAKAYAMA KI.U boxproteinsasa newfamilyofubiquitinligases[j]. 犅犻狅犮犺犲犿犻犮犪犾牔犅犻狅狆犺狔狊犻犮犪犾犚犲狊犲犪狉犮犺犆狅犿犿狌狀犻犮犪狋犻狅狀狊,2003,302(4): [8] WIBORGJ,O SHEA C,SKRIVER K.Biochemicalfunction oftypicalandvariant 犃狉犪犫犻犱犪狆狊犻狊狋犺犪犾犻犪狀犪 U boxe3ubiquit in proteinligases[j]. 犅犻狅犮犺犲犿犻犮犪犾犑狅狌狉狀犪犾,2008,413(3): [9] ZENGLR,QUSH,BORDEOSA, 犲狋犪犾.Spotedleaf11,a negativeregulatorofplantceldeathanddefense,encodesau box/armadilorepeatproteinendowedwithe3ubiquitinligase activity[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犆犲犾,2004,16(10): [10] *,. /26S [J].,2008,28(7): HUANG H J,CHEN X T.Theprogressontheubiquitin 26Sproteasomepathywayinplants[J]. 犆犺犻狀犪犅犻狅狋犲犮犺狀狅犾狅犵狔,2008,28(7): [11] CHOSK,RYU M Y,SONG C, 犲狋犪犾.ArabidopsisPUB22 andpub23arehomologousu boxe3ubiquitinligasesthat playcombinatoryrolesinresponsetodroughtstress[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犆犲犾,2008,20(7): [12] CHOSK,CHUNG H S,RYU M Y, 犲狋犪犾.Heterologous expressionandmolecularandcelularcharacterizationofca PUB1encodingahotpepperU BoxE3ubiquitinligasehomo log[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犘犺狔狊犻狅犾狅犵狔,2006,142(4): [13] SEO D H,RYU M Y,JAMMESF, 犲狋犪犾.Rolesoffour 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 U boxe3ubiquitinligasesinnegativeregulationof abscisicacid mediated droughtstressresponses[j]. 犘犾犪狀狋犘犺狔狊犻狅犾狅犵狔,2012,160(1): [14] CHOSK,BAEH,RYU M Y, 犲狋犪犾.PUB22andPUB23U BOXE3ligasesdirectlyubiquitinateRPN6,a26Sproteasome lidsubunit,forsubsequentdegradationin 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊狋犺犪犾犻犪狀犪 [J]. 犅犻狅犮犺犲犿犻犮犪犾牔犅犻狅狆犺狔狊犻犮犪犾犚犲狊犲犪狉犮犺犆狅犿犿狌狀犻犮犪狋犻狅狀狊,2015,464(4): [15] ZHAOJF,ZHAOLL, 犲狋犪犾.ArabidopsisE3ubiquitinliga sespub22andpub23negativelyregulatedroughttolerance bytargetingabareceptorpyl9fordegradation[j]. 犐狀狋犲狉狀犪狋犻狅狀犪犾犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犕狅犾犲犮狌犾犪狉犛犮犻犲狀犮犲狊,2017,18(9):1841. [16] STEGMANN M,ANDERSON R G,ICHIMURA K, 犲狋犪犾. TheubiquitinligasePUB22targetsasubunitoftheexocyst complexrequiredforpamp triggeredresponsesin 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊 [J]. 犘犾犪狀狋犆犲犾,2012,24(11): [17] FURLAN G,NAKAGAMI H,ESCHEN LIPPOLD L, 犲狋犪犾.ChangesinPUB22ubiquitinationmodestriggeredbymi togen activatedproteinkinase3dampentheimmuneresponse [J]. 犘犾犪狀狋犆犲犾,2017,29(4): [18],,. FGH )[ [J]. Y5,2004,(2): [19].? ' 68 `Y [J]. 45,1999,27(1):3 7. NIU X W.AproposalonactivelydevelopingCaraganaforest intheorthwestofchina[j]. 犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犛犺犪狀狓犻犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犾犛犮犻犲狀犮犲狊,1999,27(1):3 7. [20] ZHANG XR,HENRIQUESR,LINSS, 犲狋犪犾.Agrobacte rium mediatedtransformationof 犃狉犪犫犻犱狅狆狊犻狊狋犺犪犾犻犪狀犪 using thefloraldip method[j]. 犖犪狋狌狉犲犘狉狅狋狅犮狅犾狊,2006,1(2): [21] SHEARDLB,ZHENG N.Plantbiologysignaladvancefor abscisicacid[j]. 犖犪狋狌狉犲,2009,462(7273): [22] SALTJN,YOSHIOKA K,MOEDER W, 犲狋犪犾.Altered germinationandsubcelularlocalizationpaternsforpub44/ SAUL1inresponsetostressandphytohormonetreatments [J]. 犘犔狅犛犗狀犲,2011,6(6):e (:)

;54 ;1 ( ' ) Vol.54 No JournalofXiamenUniversity (NaturalScience) Jan.2015 doi: /j.issn RSTU V ; &! Y,,, [,2\

$;54 ;1 ( ' ) Vol.54 No JournalofXiamenUniversity (NaturalScience) Jan.2015 doi: /j.issn RSTU V ; &! Y,,, [,2\$ ;54 ;1 ( ' ) Vol.54 No.1 2015 1 JournalofXiamenUniversity (NaturalScience) Jan.2015 doi:10.6043/j.issn.0438 0479.2015.01.011 RSTU V ; &! Y,,, Z,@ [,2\] ( 8+ =,>^ E G,Y7,>^ 361102) ; : ( 犕狔犮犪犾犲狆犺狔犾狅狆犺犻犾犪